There’s one word for Texas leaders’ astonishing failure to cut property taxes | Opinion
Texans, your state leaders are stuck on stupid.
We don’t use the term lightly, but what else describes their failure, yet again, to agree on property tax cuts? All the ingredients are there: a surplus big enough to accommodate around $18 billion in reductions, broad agreement that it’s the right thing to do, ample room to compromise and the heat of legislative deadlines.
But not even with 140 days in the regular session and 30 days in a special session could Gov. Greg Abbott, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, House Speaker Dade Phelan and 180 legislators pull it off. So, they’re back at it again — Abbott brought the Senate and House back immediately Tuesday.
If stupid strikes you as not quite the right word, how about the popular definition of insanity: doing the same thing and expecting different results?
That’s precisely what Abbott did Tuesday. He took the House’s side and tried to cleverly frame his proclamation calling another special session so that only his definition of property tax relief could be enacted. As if the Senate will just go along — all 31 senators, including all the Democrats, stand behind their chamber’s plan.
Abbott further muddied the waters by directing lawmakers to consider far-fetched plans to eliminate school property taxes by having the state provide all funding, a goal of some conservative policy wonks.
So, come to think of it, we’re back to stupid.
It’s also foolish that, with money to burn, Republican leaders can’t find a compromise that lets everyone leave town satisfied, if not exactly happy. It’s a question of how, not whether, to use state funds to replace local school districts’ property tax revenue. Senators want a big increase in the homestead exemption, shifting more of the benefit to homeowners. The House has insisted upon only “tax rate compression,” meaning sending money to districts and limiting their taxation power. Abbott has been on the House’s side but would surely sign any deal that got to his desk.
The Senate budged a little in the first special session, passing a compromise bill that does both. It even threw in a cut in the business franchise tax, helping alleviate concerns that expanding the homestead exemption does nothing for businesses.
We say: all of the above. Just get it done. Homeowners deserve relief, and school districts need to know the landscape for future budget planning.
The obsession with getting the state on track to eliminate local school taxes is misguided. As we’ve previously noted, it ignores the danger of an economic downturn that pinches the state really hammering school districts. It could only be achieved through significant increases in the state sales tax. And if Austin controls 100% of the money for schools, it controls 100% of the decisions, if it wants to.
Speaking of stupid: Do you want this crowd in charge of every move your district can make?
Patrick is playing his usual political games, too. He spent the entire session poking at Phelan, giving him petty nicknames, accusing the speaker of trying to shape the bill to benefit his real-estate interests, and holding up an important open-records measure through a procedural trick. Then, he turned put-upon victim when Phelan and the House passed their tax measure and went home, thereby telling the Senate: Take it or leave it.
There’s been entirely too much of that kind of maneuvering on all sides. Ever-increasing property taxes threaten the state’s robust housing market and overall prosperity.
With plenty of money to work with, failing to achieve a deal would be — say it with us — stupid.
BEHIND THE STORY
MOREHey, who writes these editorials?
Editorials are the positions of the Editorial Board, which serves as the Fort Worth Star-Telegram’s institutional voice. The members of the board are: Cynthia M. Allen, columnist; Steve Coffman, editor and president; Bud Kennedy, columnist; Ryan J. Rusak, opinion editor; and Nicole Russell, editorial writer and columnist. Most editorials are written by Rusak or Russell. Editorials are unsigned because they represent the board’s consensus positions, not the views of individual writers.
Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.
How are topics and positions chosen?
The Editorial Board meets regularly to discuss issues in the news and what points should be made in editorials. We strive to build a consensus to produce the strongest editorials possible, but when we differ, we put matters to a vote.
The board aims to be consistent with stances it has taken in the past but usually engages in a fresh discussion based on new developments and different perspectives.
We focus on local and state news, though we will also weigh in on national issues with an eye toward their impact on Texas or the Dallas-Fort Worth area.
How are these different from news articles or signed columns?
News reporters strive to keep their opinions out of what they write. They have no input on the Editorial Board’s stances. The board consults their reporting and expertise but does its own research for editorials.
Signed columns by writers such as Allen, Kennedy and Rusak contain the writer’s personal opinions.
How can I respond to an editorial, suggest a topic or ask a question?
We invite readers to write letters to be considered for publication. The preferred method is an email to letters@star-telegram.com. To suggest a topic or ask a question, please email Rusak directly at rrusak@star-telegram.com.
This story was originally published June 28, 2023 at 10:29 AM.