Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting.

Editorial Board Endorsements

Star-Telegram endorsement: Who should be next Fort Worth mayor? | Opinion

For years, leaders across Fort Worth knew that the central city’s school district was struggling, unable to adequately teach reading and math and lacking a solid plan to fix it.

Enter Mattie Parker. The mayor rallied many of Fort Worth’s biggest names in politics, business and philanthropy to publicly confront the school board in 2024. She did it without any direct control over Fort Worth ISD or method of imposing consequences. She gave an honest assessment and a pitch to fix it without dividing the board or the community.

That kind of “soft power” influence is among a mayor’s most useful tools when a city manager runs government and enacting policy changes requires wrangling at least five other City Council votes. Parker has increasingly shown a deftness with it in her two terms, and voters should give her a third.

Parker’s second term could have brought turmoil. The city added two new council members on top of heavy recent turnover on the dais. Longtime City Manager David Cooke retired, triggering the most important direct decision the council can make. Fort Worth is looking for its fourth police chief in less than six years. Partisan or ideological politics have at times cast a shadow over the council.

Parker, a 41-year-old lawyer who lives in Ridglea North, has helped keep things steady. She avoids showy political fights and focuses on the challenges of a booming city. Just as importantly, she also seeks to maximize the opportunities of growth, such as spreading prosperity wider and addressing long-term problems, as with the schools.

There are times that we wish she brought a sharper edge. She’s been careful not to get directly involved in school board politics, and we wonder if meaningful change could have moved faster had someone with influence worked to elect better trustees or at least give voters more choices.

Parker is one of the few Republican mayors of a large U.S. city and the first millennial elected to the post. She’s right to keep it a nonpartisan post, but she could play a bigger role in confronting some of the far-right excesses that are growing in Tarrant County and Texas.

Parker realizes the limits of her position and where she can be most effective, which is a valuable trait. She’ll be a good salesperson for the city’s much-needed $800 million bond next year. And she’ll help keep a council that is younger and more diverse than ever on track.

Parker has drawn little meaningful opposition in her quest for a third term. Perhaps the most promising is Josh Lucas. The 33-year-old community ministries coordinator at Broadway Baptist Church is passionate about social justice issues. The problem is that he’s so obsessed with the actions of the Republican majority on the Tarrant County Commissioners Court that he sounds like a candidate for that post, not leadership of the city.

Lawrence Walker a 53-year-old owner of a landscaping business, and Chris Wood, 57, who owns a self-care business, were at least able to discuss municipal issues in our interviews with the candidates.

Then, there’s Donnell Ballard, 53, who made a name for himself as a young activist addressing the City Council. Jeremy F. Labelle, 40, and Millennium Anton C. Woods Jr., 25, are barely present as candidates. Alyson Kennedy, 74, is running as a Socialist Workers Party candidate.

Why are these candidates seeking to be mayor? Some couldn’t even tell us. Like Lucas, they seem focused on government issues at other levels, including federal.

But none of the challengers is a serious contender. Consider it more evidence of Parker’s success: No one with a legitimate political profile wants to take her on.

The mayor is elected citywide and serves a two-year term. Early voting is April 22-29; Election Day is May 3. If no candidate receives an outright majority, the top two finishers will advance to a runoff.

Mattie Parker
Mattie Parker

BEHIND THE STORY

MORE

Hey, who writes these editorials?

Editorials are the positions of the Editorial Board, which serves as the Fort Worth Star-Telegram’s institutional voice. The members of the board are: Cynthia M. Allen, columnist; Steve Coffman, editor and president; Bud Kennedy, columnist; and Ryan J. Rusak, opinion editor. Most editorials are written by Rusak. Editorials are unsigned because they represent the board’s consensus positions, not the views of individual writers.

Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.

How are topics and positions chosen?

The Editorial Board meets regularly to discuss issues in the news and what points should be made in editorials. We strive to build a consensus to produce the strongest editorials possible, but when we differ, we put matters to a vote.

The board aims to be consistent with stances it has taken in the past but usually engages in a fresh discussion based on new developments and different perspectives.

We focus on local and state news, though we will also weigh in on national issues with an eye toward their impact on Texas or the Dallas-Fort Worth area.

How are these different from news articles or signed columns?

News reporters strive to keep their opinions out of what they write. They have no input on the Editorial Board’s stances. The board consults their reporting and expertise but does its own research for editorials.

Signed columns by writers such as Allen, Kennedy and Rusak contain the writer’s personal opinions.

How can I respond to an editorial, suggest a topic or ask a question?

We invite readers to write letters to be considered for publication. The preferred method is an email to letters@star-telegram.com. To suggest a topic or ask a question, please email Rusak directly at rrusak@star-telegram.com.

This story was originally published April 20, 2025 at 5:39 AM.

Related Stories from Fort Worth Star-Telegram
Get unlimited digital access
#ReadLocal

Try 1 month for $1

CLAIM OFFER