Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting.

Editorials

Uvalde shooting report finds ‘systemic failures.’ Use it to prevent future attacks.

Just when we thought details surrounding the Uvalde shooting couldn’t get worse, they have. Between the nearly 80 page report the Texas House’s investigative committee released and the latest body cam video Uvalde’s mayor made public, the fullest account we have yet of that fateful day is nothing short of horrific.

The report and video unveil details that piece together the tragic events of May 24, when a gunman killed 21 people, in a way that is more comprehensive, but just as infuriating — if not more so — than before.

From open doors and a gunman whom friends referred to as “school shooter,” to thousands of dollars spent on gun and ammo purchases, to failed law enforcement at every turn, the gunman could have been stopped but was not, creating a perfect storm of chaos and death.

Approximately 376 law enforcement officials ultimately converged at the school that day, including nearly 150 U.S. Border Patrol agents and 91 state police officials. Yet still, the gunman was not confronted until well over an hour after he arrived at the school and killed 19 students and two teachers.

One of the reasons the gunman was not stopped sooner was that no one really took command, which resulted in “egregiously poor” decision-making among the hundreds of law enforcement personnel there. The report noted their lack of urgency and bravery, too. “At Robb Elementary, law enforcement responders failed to adhere to their active shooter training, and they failed to prioritize saving innocent lives over their own safety,” the report said.

The body camera of one of the officers revealed a crucial piece of this puzzle that had been missing until now. The video from Sgt. Daniel Coronodo shows him telling dispatch he believes the gunman has barricaded himself inside an office, not a classroom. It’s not clear how he came to this false conclusion but it seems to be part of why officers were not in a rush to break down the door.

Finally, more body cam footage captures the moment officers learn via 911 dispatch that the gunman is inside the classroom with “a room full of victims.” One of the wounded children had actually called 911 from inside the room. Still, there was no rush to descend on the gunman.

Pete Arredondo, chief of the Uvalde school district police, lacked focus on the bigger picture, saving lives: He obsessively tries to enter the room with a set of keys and for some bizarre reason, he continues to plead with the gunman. “Sir if you can hear me, please put your firearm down, sir,” he says. Arredondo’s earnest, but wholly misguided, search for proper keys and his willingness to attempt a negotiation with a ruthless killer as children lay dying cost time and lives.

The report detailed even more information about the gunman’s personality, character, and methodical acquisition of firearms that fit the profile of an angry, motivated, killer. Hindsight is 20/20 but a few family members and friends seemed to be fully aware he was unhealthy and even dangerous. He was angry, a bully, and even had the nickname “school shooter.” He had over 100 absences each school year beginning in 2018, had only a ninth grade education at age 17, and had fallen out with both his mother and father.

We must figure out how, in the future, information like this that might seem piecemeal to one person, but together could unveil a full picture of potentially dangerous behavior for a juvenile or young adult with no record, can be reported to authorities in a way that’s helpful. As for his firearm purchases, the law only requires reporting the purchase of multiple handguns in a short time to the police. The gunman bought AR-15-style rifles — so they were not reported. The people who sold him his guns even noted his odd dress and behavior. This loophole must be closed.

A new school year begins in Texas soon. Going forward, school districts and lawmakers must ask themselves: How much public money is spent writing disaster plans that aren’t followed? Turns out, Uvalde had one but no one executed it. If we need them, and one would think we do, how can we ensure they are followed in a common sense manner, knowing real life doesn’t follow black and white emergency plans?

Local districts need to review their security plans, including keeping school doors locked. Going forward, as tedious as it may be, schools should strive to have one access point and harden their entrances with as much security as possible.

School districts should also strengthen their relationships with police and review together: Who does what in a crisis? If the school has its own police force, how will they coordinate with other police agencies? Perhaps there should be meetings between school boards and city councils — with this report in hand as a litmus test —to review security procedures.

As nauseating as this report and body cam videos are, we must continue to learn what we can from that day so we don’t repeat the same mistakes.

BEHIND THE STORY

MORE

Hey, who writes these editorials?

Editorials are the positions of the Editorial Board, which serves as the Fort Worth Star-Telegram’s institutional voice. The members of the board are: Cynthia M. Allen, columnist; Steve Coffman, editor and president; Bud Kennedy, columnist; Ryan J. Rusak, opinion editor; and Nicole Russell, editorial writer and columnist. Most editorials are written by Rusak or Russell. Editorials are unsigned because they represent the board’s consensus positions, not the views of individual writers.

Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.

How are topics and positions chosen?

The Editorial Board meets regularly to discuss issues in the news and what points should be made in editorials. We strive to build a consensus to produce the strongest editorials possible, but when we differ, we put matters to a vote.

The board aims to be consistent with stances it has taken in the past but usually engages in a fresh discussion based on new developments and different perspectives.

We focus on local and state news, though we will also weigh in on national issues with an eye toward their impact on Texas or the Dallas-Fort Worth area.

How are these different from news articles or signed columns?

News reporters strive to keep their opinions out of what they write. They have no input on the Editorial Board’s stances. The board consults their reporting and expertise but does its own research for editorials.

Signed columns by writers such as Allen, Kennedy and Rusak contain the writer’s personal opinions.

How can I respond to an editorial, suggest a topic or ask a question?

We invite readers to write letters to be considered for publication. The preferred method is an email to letters@star-telegram.com. To suggest a topic or ask a question, please email Rusak directly at rrusak@star-telegram.com.

This story was originally published July 18, 2022 at 3:16 PM.

Get unlimited digital access
#ReadLocal

Try 1 month for $1

CLAIM OFFER