Future of Texas Enterprise Fund uncertain under new governor
01/03/2014 4:03 PM
01/03/2014 4:05 PM
When Gov. Rick Perry steps down at the end of this year, he will have awarded more than $508 million from the taxpayer-financed Texas Enterprise Fund to businesses looking to move to the state or expand operations here.
But the future of the fund, which critics call corporate welfare, is unclear. The two front-runners to replace Perry, Republican Attorney General Greg Abbott and Democratic state Sen. Wendy Davis of Fort Worth, have offered mixed messages on the economic development fund, leaving questions about whether it will extend beyond Perry’s tenure.
The fund has become a staple of Perry’s governorship. The Legislature created it at his request a decade ago, giving him the power — with the approval of the House speaker and the lieutenant governor — to grant awards with an initial appropriation of $285 million from the state’s rainy-day fund.
Since then, Perry has relied heavily on it as a job-recruiting tool, awarding millions in tax dollars to “close deals” with more than 100 companies.
Since he announced his candidacy, Abbott’s stance on the fund has been cloudy. He said in his initial stump speech that he wants to get government “out of the business of picking winners and losers.” But when asked during a fall campaign stop whether he would discontinue Perry’s fund, Abbott did not directly answer, saying a “good tax structure” is the best incentive for business in Texas.
When asked for clarification about whether an Abbott governorship would include the enterprise fund, spokesman Avdiel Huerta reiterated the attorney general’s comments.
“If Texas has the appropriate tax structure, that’s going to be the strongest incentive any business needs, whether it be businesses thinking about relocating from another state or businesses already here,” Huerta said.
A week after announcing her candidacy, Davis held a campaign event at San Antonio-based Rackspace, an Internet hosting and data storage company that received a $22 million enterprise fund grant in 2007. She praised the arrangement as a model for public-private partnerships.
But Davis’ support of the fund seems to depend on a return on investment. Campaign spokeswoman Rebecca Acuña said the senator “supports the premise of the Texas Enterprise Fund” but has worked to increase its transparency and accountability to taxpayers.
And amid steep budget cuts to public education in 2011, Davis offered an amendment to defund the enterprise fund to lessen the burden on public schools. The amendment was rejected, and Davis later said it was “something I would usually never advocate” for, according to a report in the San Antonio Express-News.
After the fund went unaudited for a decade, the Legislature passed a bill in 2013 co-authored by Davis requiring the state auditor to ensure that the fund has followed state regulations in its grant approval and oversight process.
Fiscal watchdogs have accused Perry of using the fund as a political slush fund, giving handouts to corporations and executives who support him. The governor has collected millions of dollars in campaign contributions from executives, political action committees and investors tied to companies that have received enterprise fund awards, including Sanderson Farms, which received a $500,000 grant, and McLane Advanced Technologies, which received a $1 million grant.
Perry’s office has vehemently denied that such contributions influence the governor’s decision-making.
The Legislature appropriated millions of dollars in additional financing to the enterprise fund in the years after it was created, and the fund kept its money even amid the sweeping state budget cuts of 2011. Since then, lawmakers have not added more money to the pot.
As of the end of 2012, $139 million remained in the fund, according to a report prepared by the governor’s office. Since then, Perry has continued to grant new awards, including $12 million to Chevron in July and $2.1 million to Natgasoline in November.
If the fund runs dry, the Legislature would have to keep funding it — under a new governor — or let it peter out.
Even though new money hasn’t come into the fund in recent years, Perry spokeswoman Lucy Nashed said the governor and the Legislature continue “to see the value in ensuring Texas is using every tool possible to compete for jobs and investment.”
When asked whether the governor hopes the fund will exist beyond his tenure, Nashed reiterated the statement.
Join the Discussion
Fort Worth Star-Telegram is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.