Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting.

Editorials

Another special session on school choice, border? Gov. Abbott, take a break already | Opinion

Texas Governor Greg Abbott raises his fist after speaking at a Parent Empowerment Rally in the auditorium of the Texas Capitol on Monday, Oct. 16, 2023.
Texas Governor Greg Abbott raises his fist after speaking at a Parent Empowerment Rally in the auditorium of the Texas Capitol on Monday, Oct. 16, 2023. USA TODAY NETWORK

Whatever happened to our part-time Legislature?

The third special session expired Tuesday, with no deal on school choice, raises for teachers, border security or other so-called priorities. So, Gov. Greg Abbott called lawmakers back Tuesday night for a fourth special session.

It’s a mistake. Lawmakers and their leaders are divided, frustrated and making little progress. Most are eager to campaign for their primaries, now less than four months away.

Abbott should send them home. Let Republicans battle it out in elections, get some clarity (hopefully) on difficult issues and come back in the spring.

The governor’s commitment to his goals is admirable. It’s not easy to take a loss, even with hopes it will be short-lived. Particularly when you’ve crisscrossed the state predicting victory on legislation to create “education savings accounts,” as Abbott has for months.

House Speaker Dade Phelan presides over the debate of SB 7, which would ban COVID vaccine mandates, at the Capitol on Wednesday October 25, 2023.
House Speaker Dade Phelan presides over the debate of SB 7, which would ban COVID vaccine mandates, at the Capitol on Wednesday October 25, 2023. Jay Janner/American-Statesman USA TODAY NETWORK

It’s been clear for a while, though, that Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and Phelan are bogged down by animosity and policy differences. They’d rather snipe at each other than negotiate. What will change in the next few days or weeks to alter that? Anyone think that having Thanksgiving disrupted by another session will boost lawmakers’ spirit to compromise?

If anything, Abbott’s efforts to let Texas families access public dollars for school expenses, including private-school tuition, is losing ground. With Democrats united on the issue, Abbott has always needed to win over at least a dozen skeptical House Republicans, particularly from rural districts without much interest in the issue. It appears nothing has budged them, and there’s increasing concern about how to safeguard hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars if they are funneled to private entities.

And it’s not just schools. It seems the House and Senate are split on how much power to give Texas law enforcement to police illegal immigration. At a minimum, adding another duty for state troopers is an idea fraught with potential unintended consequences, and it needs careful debate, not a slam-bang bill through a special session.

Some conservatives want even more issues added to the agenda, too. Whatever happened to smaller government that does less?

On education, we remain with the governor in spirit — a small voucher program to test the idea and particularly help families in the most intractable public schools is a good policy experiment. To win the needed House votes, Abbott is signaling openness to billions in new funding for public schools and changes to the overall finance system.

But in his desperation to sweeten the pot, the governor has also suggested the state could throw out the STAAR exam. That might sound great, and if lawmakers want to find ways to reduce the stakes of a single set of exams, that might be palatable. Abbott runs the risk, however, of sinking the main tool of accountability for public schools to get his voucher program.

The point of school choice should be to offer relief for those in the lowest-performing schools and competitive incentives for those campuses and districts to improve. Walking away from accountability measurements, particularly those that evaluate progress for the low-income children most at risk of falling behind, would be a terrible mistake.

Ever had a dog who figured out he could just eat the bacon you’ve wrapped around the pill you want him to take? Abbott risks becoming the too-persistent owner who suddenly realizes he’s given away the whole pack of bacon without getting the results he wanted.

He should give it a rest and try again in, say, May.

BEHIND THE STORY

MORE

Hey, who writes these editorials?

Editorials are the positions of the Editorial Board, which serves as the Fort Worth Star-Telegram’s institutional voice. The members of the board are: Cynthia M. Allen, columnist; Steve Coffman, editor and president; Bud Kennedy, columnist; Ryan J. Rusak, opinion editor; and Nicole Russell, editorial writer and columnist. Most editorials are written by Rusak or Russell. Editorials are unsigned because they represent the board’s consensus positions, not the views of individual writers.

Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.

How are topics and positions chosen?

The Editorial Board meets regularly to discuss issues in the news and what points should be made in editorials. We strive to build a consensus to produce the strongest editorials possible, but when we differ, we put matters to a vote.

The board aims to be consistent with stances it has taken in the past but usually engages in a fresh discussion based on new developments and different perspectives.

We focus on local and state news, though we will also weigh in on national issues with an eye toward their impact on Texas or the Dallas-Fort Worth area.

How are these different from news articles or signed columns?

News reporters strive to keep their opinions out of what they write. They have no input on the Editorial Board’s stances. The board consults their reporting and expertise but does its own research for editorials.

Signed columns by writers such as Allen, Kennedy and Rusak contain the writer’s personal opinions.

How can I respond to an editorial, suggest a topic or ask a question?

We invite readers to write letters to be considered for publication. The preferred method is an email to letters@star-telegram.com. To suggest a topic or ask a question, please email Rusak directly at rrusak@star-telegram.com.

Do you have an opinion on this topic? Tell us!

We love to hear from Texans with opinions on the news — and to publish those views in the Opinion section.

• Letters should be no more than 150 words.

• Writers should submit letters only once every 30 days.

• Include your name, address (including city of residence), phone number and email address, so we can contact you if we have questions.

You can submit a letter to the editor two ways:

• Email letters@star-telegram.com (preferred).

• Fill out this online form.

Please note: Letters will be edited for style and clarity. Publication is not guaranteed. The best letters are focused on one topic.

This story was originally published November 7, 2023 at 3:59 PM.

Get unlimited digital access
#ReadLocal

Try 1 month for $1

CLAIM OFFER