Fort Worth ISD botched sex education update. Parents and taxpayers deserve better | Opinion
There won’t be any sex education for Fort Worth ISD students this year. And it’s not because a group of parents got it shut down or teachers refused to teach it.
It’s because the district and school board made some major missteps they need to correct — and quickly. The confusion over updates to a curriculum smacks of sloppiness or an effort to bypass parental review, and neither is acceptable from those responsible for the education of nearly 80,000 kids.
Superintendent Angélica Ramsey announced the decision after questions arose about a curriculum update the district purchased last year for nearly $2.6 million. The Fort Worth ISD school board approved the purchase from the California-based HealthSmart, updating the entire health education curriculum. But news has surfaced that trustees did not discuss the purchase, nor was it part of a consent agenda, as required. The sex education curriculum is part of the purchase but wouldn’t be used until approved.
Furthermore, we haven’t been able to review the actual curriculum but longtime State Board of Education member Pat Hardy, R-Fort Worth, contends that the HealthSmart curriculum contradicts Texas law because it does not align with new state standards.
These facts raise several questions: Why did the board push this through quietly? Does the board agree that the best solution now is simply to cancel any sex education teaching for the whole year? Could the district have proceeded one more year with the old curriculum?
Ramsey is still settling in as superintendent, a job she started in September. The district has many problems and priorities, and with doubts about the curriculum and process, her best option was to press pause. But it never should have come to this point.
Parents who attended a board meeting last week came armed with complaints about what little they did know about the curriculum. The lack of transparency was the biggest complaint, followed by the fact that some of the language in the curriculum about body parts adopted language rooted in gender fluidity.
All school curriculum should be posted online for parents to view. That would answer parents’ calls for transparency and could curtail some of the controversy at school board meetings.
A lot of the disputes at FWISD board meetings are over the fact that some parents feel like they’re getting snowed. Parents believe that the district is not being forthright about changes. Transparency is vital to the health and reputation of any government. The district should have nothing to hide.
Likewise, once parents have had a chance to review curriculum on a subject such as sex education, they should be able to opt their children out. Some families may prefer to teach their own values and priorities at home.
It goes without saying that sex education curriculum must follow Texas law and standards.
Sex education curriculum should be basic, err on the side of encouraging kids to be cautious when it comes to sex and provide accurate information about sexually transmitted infections. Direct, straightforward language seems like the best practice.
But for all these things to take place, the board must put forth a curriculum for review and discussion. Fort Worth ISD can’t duck parent participation. If that was the goal, it’s been a costly lesson.
Editor’s note: Updated to reflect that the district purchased materials for an overall health education curriculum. Sex education materials are available as a result but not in use until formally approved.
BEHIND THE STORY
MOREHey, who writes these editorials?
Editorials are the positions of the Editorial Board, which serves as the Fort Worth Star-Telegram’s institutional voice. The members of the board are: Cynthia M. Allen, columnist; Steve Coffman, editor and president; Bud Kennedy, columnist; Ryan J. Rusak, opinion editor; and Nicole Russell, editorial writer and columnist. Most editorials are written by Rusak or Russell. Editorials are unsigned because they represent the board’s consensus positions, not the views of individual writers.
Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.
How are topics and positions chosen?
The Editorial Board meets regularly to discuss issues in the news and what points should be made in editorials. We strive to build a consensus to produce the strongest editorials possible, but when we differ, we put matters to a vote.
The board aims to be consistent with stances it has taken in the past but usually engages in a fresh discussion based on new developments and different perspectives.
We focus on local and state news, though we will also weigh in on national issues with an eye toward their impact on Texas or the Dallas-Fort Worth area.
How are these different from news articles or signed columns?
News reporters strive to keep their opinions out of what they write. They have no input on the Editorial Board’s stances. The board consults their reporting and expertise but does its own research for editorials.
Signed columns by writers such as Allen, Kennedy and Rusak contain the writer’s personal opinions.
How can I respond to an editorial, suggest a topic or ask a question?
We invite readers to write letters to be considered for publication. The preferred method is an email to letters@star-telegram.com. To suggest a topic or ask a question, please email Rusak directly at rrusak@star-telegram.com.
This story was originally published February 3, 2023 at 5:32 AM.