Texas politicians, stop your crusade on school libraries before we see books burned
The battle over books in school libraries has quickly devolved into a game of: “Can you top this?”
First, there was a Southlake school administrator’s absurd instruction to teachers that, under a vague new state law, they couldn’t have a book about the Holocaust in their classrooms without one presenting an opposing perspective. Then, it was Fort Worth Rep. Matt Krause, a candidate for attorney general, using his legislative perch to ask school districts to report whether they have hundreds of books on hand, many of them on sensitive issues of race and sexuality.
Gov. Greg Abbott escalated things quickly, first asking the Texas Association of School Boards to police sensitive material in schools. Then, he ordered the Texas Education Agency to investigate possible criminal activity around “pornography” in schools.
That last one, in particular, was preposterous. As if an agency full of education bureaucrats could suddenly morph into CSI: School Libraries.
It also shows how much these actions are rooted in politics. Abbott is determined to show he’s the most conservative governor around, and Krause is trying to find a way to get the attention of hard-core GOP voters before the crowded primary for attorney general.
Such stunts are often harmless. But censorship of books has a long, inglorious history. It’s a dangerous fire to play with, but our state leaders are reaching in with both hands.
And it will continue. Parents are focusing on education issues in a new way. It’s mostly political conservatives, outraged by progressive teachings on race and sex. But many others who were often apolitical, at least on education issues, are newly dialed in. The workings of their schools and what their kids are taught grabbed their attention when it was virtually piped into their homes during the pandemic.
As always, these issues are best handled at the local level. If schools have inappropriate material or if disputes over what should be available must be resolved, it’s best done by working with local PTAs and school administrators or school boards.
When lawmakers react, there is often grandstanding, overreach and poorly written law, as we saw in the Legislature’s two attempts to address lessons about race, history and current events in Texas schools. The vagueness of what they produced is at least partly to blame for the Southlake Holocaust disaster.
When examples such as a recent Keller library dispute come to light, it only fuels the fire. Parents discovered a sexually explicit graphic novel, they demanded action. The book, “Gender Queer: A Memoir,” is inappropriate for a school library, period. Materials to help students struggling with sexuality or gender identity need not be graphic.
But those libraries often have thousands of books. It’s tough for a school librarian to review every item, and they’re trying to meet a broad range of needs and demands about what should be available to children.
School districts would be wise to have a well-defined process to review books, understand what they have on hand and set standards. Dealing with books via individual controversies is divisive and time consuming.
Parents should have the right to say their children won’t have access to certain materials. But they shouldn’t be able to have an absolute veto affecting all students. A clear set of community standards, set by school boards with parental input, should guide decisions.
But attempting to criminalize certain content does more damage than just creating a political sideshow. It opens the door to sweeping censorship and even suggestions of book burning. Our communities can and should handle these controversies much more responsibly than that.
BEHIND THE STORY
MOREHey, who writes these editorials?
Editorials are the positions of the Editorial Board, which serves as the Fort Worth Star-Telegram’s institutional voice. The members of the board are: Cynthia M. Allen, columnist; Steve Coffman, editor and president; Bud Kennedy, columnist; Ryan J. Rusak, opinion editor; and Nicole Russell, editorial writer and columnist. Most editorials are written by Rusak or Russell. Editorials are unsigned because they represent the board’s consensus positions, not the views of individual writers.
Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.
How are topics and positions chosen?
The Editorial Board meets regularly to discuss issues in the news and what points should be made in editorials. We strive to build a consensus to produce the strongest editorials possible, but when we differ, we put matters to a vote.
The board aims to be consistent with stances it has taken in the past but usually engages in a fresh discussion based on new developments and different perspectives.
We focus on local and state news, though we will also weigh in on national issues with an eye toward their impact on Texas or the Dallas-Fort Worth area.
How are these different from news articles or signed columns?
News reporters strive to keep their opinions out of what they write. They have no input on the Editorial Board’s stances. The board consults their reporting and expertise but does its own research for editorials.
Signed columns by writers such as Allen, Kennedy and Rusak contain the writer’s personal opinions.
How can I respond to an editorial, suggest a topic or ask a question?
We invite readers to write letters to be considered for publication. The preferred method is an email to letters@star-telegram.com. To suggest a topic or ask a question, please email Rusak directly at rrusak@star-telegram.com.