How Southlake’s fight over race, schools could show a path forward on a tough topic
The national spotlight on Southlake’s elections has moved on. Now, the Carroll ISD must as well.
The elections that placed two conservative opponents of the district’s proposed “cultural competence” plan on the school board and saw aligned City Council candidates win were definitive. Whatever you think of the results, a group of unhappy citizens banded together to demand change in their community. It’s what we constantly hope voters will do, and in Southlake, they did it in large numbers.
That’s the campaign. The hard part, as the saying goes, is governing.
Carroll ISD still has to address racism head-on. Throughout years of debate, too many painful stories of mistreatment have emerged from the Dragon community. And as the nationwide attention shows, battles over what we teach children about American history aren’t going away any time soon.
Graduates of the district need to be fully prepared for a diverse world that demands sensitivity and respect around issues of identity. In college and in the workforce, they’ll be expected to be open and inclusive to all — and they will not succeed otherwise. Failing to teach these values is a dereliction of duty.
Southlake itself isn’t as much of a bubble as it used to be. The community is changing, in part because of the draw of the excellent Carroll schools. Teaching students to be respectful to all their neighbors is good for everyone in Southlake.
CULTURAL PLAN’S FLAWS
There were obvious missteps all along the way with the Cultural Competence Action Plan, drafted by a large group after disgusting videos of students repeating the N-word emerged in 2018. A proposal to track microaggressions got the most attention, but the board’s handling of the plan, including alleged violations of Texas’ open-meetings law, was flawed.
The national argument over “critical race theory” eventually overshadowed the specifics of the local debate. After the police murder of George Floyd in Minnesota and the protests (and yes, riots) that followed, Americans everywhere asked urgent questions about race, including what we teach our children. Some of our narratives have been wrong or incomplete, glossing over decades of systematic oppression of Black Americans and its lasting effects.
But millions of Americans, including plenty of minorities, have drawn the line at the idea that everything must be viewed through the lens of race. They don’t want their children taught that America was born in sin and is irredeemable, because they’ve seen America rise to its ideals. For the sake of all children, they want the focus to be on individuals, their achievements and their character. Judging people entirely by their memberships in groups is no way to get past racism.
BACKLASH IN TEXAS
As so often happens, the backlash has gone too far. The Texas Legislature is poised to approve a bill that would reach deeply into the classroom and tell individual teachers exactly what they can’t say on race. It has some admirable, if obvious, provisions, such as a prohibition against teaching that one race is inherently better or worse than the other. But it goes too far.
Respectful compromise is necessary at all levels. But the solution isn’t really that complicated. Children should learn that slavery, the oppression that followed it and the ongoing effects of racism are a stain contrary to our ideals and that we all have a role to play in cleaning it up.
They should also be taught that the U.S. has been the beacon for freedom in the world, even when deeply flawed, and has made tremendous strides against racism in a matter of decades.
Youngsters can’t leave school thinking either that they are inherently superior or inferior because of their race — whatever that race is — or that the work of ensuring equality is done.
If, somehow, Southlake can strike the balance eluding so many of our institutions, all the national attention will be well deserved.
BEHIND THE STORY
MOREHey, who writes these editorials?
Editorials are the positions of the Editorial Board, which serves as the Fort Worth Star-Telegram’s institutional voice. The members of the board are: Cynthia M. Allen, columnist; Steve Coffman, editor and president; Bud Kennedy, columnist; Ryan J. Rusak, opinion editor; and Nicole Russell, editorial writer and columnist. Most editorials are written by Rusak or Russell. Editorials are unsigned because they represent the board’s consensus positions, not the views of individual writers.
Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.
How are topics and positions chosen?
The Editorial Board meets regularly to discuss issues in the news and what points should be made in editorials. We strive to build a consensus to produce the strongest editorials possible, but when we differ, we put matters to a vote.
The board aims to be consistent with stances it has taken in the past but usually engages in a fresh discussion based on new developments and different perspectives.
We focus on local and state news, though we will also weigh in on national issues with an eye toward their impact on Texas or the Dallas-Fort Worth area.
How are these different from news articles or signed columns?
News reporters strive to keep their opinions out of what they write. They have no input on the Editorial Board’s stances. The board consults their reporting and expertise but does its own research for editorials.
Signed columns by writers such as Allen, Kennedy and Rusak contain the writer’s personal opinions.
How can I respond to an editorial, suggest a topic or ask a question?
We invite readers to write letters to be considered for publication. The preferred method is an email to letters@star-telegram.com. To suggest a topic or ask a question, please email Rusak directly at rrusak@star-telegram.com.