Business

Charles Schwab, Fidelity alert workers to forced 401(k), IRA rule

As Americans look to secure their financial futures, they are smartly looking to maximize their wealth for retirement, capitalizing on every available tax-advantaged account to build a robust nest egg.

For decades, older workers have relied on special provisions to accelerate their savings during their peak earning years.

Financial industry giants Fidelity Investments and Charles Schwab frequently analyze these shifting regulatory landscapes to help savers navigate updates to Internal Revenue Service (IRS) guidelines.

And both companies are highlighting a major shift in federal policy that is forcing many people to adjust their late-career savings.

Beginning in 2026, the SECURE 2.0 Act is mandating a change in how higher-earners age 50 and over make catch-up contributions to their employer-sponsored plans.

"Starting in 2026, higher earners age 50 and older must make catch-up contributions as Roth contributions," Fidelity explained. "That means paying taxes now but enjoying tax-free money later."

Charles Schwab clarified exactly what is meant by "higher earners."

"Workers who are 50 or older who earned more than $150,000 in FICA wages in the prior year will need to make any catch-up contributions on a Roth basis," Schwab wrote.

Understanding the new rule regarding 401(k)s, IRAs

To clarify further, if you are 50 or older, you can still put up to the existing $24,500 limit into your main workplace retirement account using pre-tax or Roth (after-tax) dollars, according to the IRS.

It is the rules for the extra "catch-up" savings you are allowed to add on top of that to which this change applies.

If you made more than $150,000 last year, the government's requirement that your catch-up savings go into a Roth 401(k) account means you will pay taxes on that extra money now, but you can withdraw it completely tax-free when you retire.

Americans who will be 50 or older in 2026 can use the standard catch-up limit for 401(k) plans, which is $8,000.

If you are in your early 60s - specifically ages 60 through 63 - you can take advantage of an even higher catch-up limit in most employer plans.

"For 2026, this higher catch-up contribution limit is $11,250 (instead of $8,000)," the IRS explained.

Importantly, note that if you made $150,000 or less, nothing changes for you. You can keep putting your catch-up money into a traditional pre-tax account or a Roth account - the choice is yours.

 Charles Schwab and Fidelity Investments highlight a new rule for older high earners that requires they add their catch-up contributions to Roth accounts. Shutterstock
Charles Schwab and Fidelity Investments highlight a new rule for older high earners that requires they add their catch-up contributions to Roth accounts. Shutterstock

Also, keep in mind that this new rule only applies to workplace plans such as a 401(k). It does not affect personal IRAs, which still follow the old rules.

Real-world 401(k) scenarios implementing the new rule

To help savers determine how these shifting guidelines affect their personal portfolios, I calculated a few scenarios you might encounter under the new rules.

Depending on your age, current income level, and preferred retirement account type, your savings strategy should fall into one of three distinct categories. You will likely find your personal financial situation roughly identifying with one of these groups.

The following are specific examples that illustrate how the 2026 mandates apply to different household circumstances, highlighting how age thresholds and prior-year wages dictate your 401(k) contribution limits and your exact tax treatment.

Scenario 1: The standard mid-career high earner

Saver 1 is 54 years old and earned $185,000 in FICA wages last year. Under the 2026 rules, they can contribute up to the standard $24,500 limit into their workplace 401(k) using pre-tax dollars to lower their current taxable income.

However, because their income exceeds the $150,000 threshold, their extra $8,000 age-based catch-up contribution cannot be deducted pre-tax. Their employer's plan automatically routes this $8,000 catch-up portion into a Roth 401(k) account.

Saver 1 must pay income taxes on that catch-up money today, but the funds, along with all investment growth, will be completely tax-free when making withdrawals during retirement.

Scenario 2: The early-60s super catch-up saver

Saver 2 is 61 years old and brought home $210,000 last year. Because they fall into the age bracket of 60 through 63, they qualify for the enhanced super catch-up provision.

Instead of the standard $8,000 limit, Saver 2 is allowed to save an additional $11,250 on top of their base $24,500 contribution, allowing them to stack a total of $35,750 in their workplace plan.

However, because their prior-year compensation exceeded the $150,000 threshold, the new mandate requires that their entire $11,250 super catch-up be designated as a Roth contribution, locking in tax-free growth for their upcoming retirement years.

Scenario 3: The moderate income or IRA investor

Saver 3 is 52 years old and earned $95,000 last year at their workplace. Because their income is under the $150,000 threshold, they are completely exempt from the new mandate, so they can comfortably contribute their base $24,500 plus their standard $8,000 catch-up entirely on a traditional pre-tax basis.

Additionally, Saver 3 contributes to a personal traditional IRA.

Because the new legislation strictly targets employer-sponsored workplace plans and does not currently impact IRAs, Saver 3 can maximize their IRA base contribution of $7,500 and add their regular IRA catch-up amount of $1,100 more (for a total limit of $8,600) using pre-tax dollars.

(Source:Jeffrey Quiggle, TheStreet)

I'm hopeful that mapping out these scenarios helps turn abstract IRS regulations into concrete examples that resemble your own financial reality.

Identifying which profile aligns with one's age and income ought to help savers navigate these structural changes and optimize their late-career savings strategy in the interest of a financially rewarding retirement.

Note: This piece of financial journalism is for educational purposes only and not for formal tax or investment advice.

Related: Dave Ramsey warns Americans on 401(k)s, IRAs (he's not wrong)

The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

This story was originally published July 8, 2026 at 7:43 PM.

Get unlimited digital access
#ReadLocal

Try 1 month for $1

CLAIM OFFER