North Texas Congressmen Michael Burgess and Marc Veasey don’t usually vote the same way.
But the conservative Republican and liberal Democrat were aligned last week when both voted against a trade bill they oppose for very different reasons.
The Trade Promotion Authority bill, which narrowly passed the House on Thursday in a revamped form, would enable the president to submit trade deals to Congress for an up or down vote, without any congressional amendments.
But some Republicans, usually reliably pro-trade, balked at the bill. And Democrats did not feel a connected piece of legislation to help workers displaced by trade went far enough.
Sign Up and Save
Get six months of free digital access to the Star-Telegram
“We’ve got a situation where the president has exceeded his authority at every opportunity,” Burgess said in an interview. The Lewisville Republican is a physician who has been an outspoken opponent of the president’s signature legislation, the Affordable Care Act.
“I don’t trust him for anything,” he said. As for the Trade Adjustment Assistance bill to help workers, Burgess said, “If you’ve got to rescue people to pass a trade bill, what is the point of the trade bill in the first place?”
Veasey, on the other hand, is a big Obama supporter.
A former Capitol Hill staffer and Texas state representative, Veasey was first elected in 2012. The Fort Worth native who is African-American represents a new congressional district between Fort Worth and Dallas that has a large black and Hispanic population.
“I was concerned about the bill by the constituents I had heard from,” Veasey said in an interview. “People were concerned about jobs.” The TAA bill, he thought, fell short in helping workers. “A lot of us felt this bill wasn’t funded enough,” he said. “Everyone is concerned about manufacturing in this country.”
So, Veasey and Burgess voted against the trade bill. According to opencongress.org, a nonpartisan website, the two Texans have only voted the same way 25 percent of the time this year.
And some members in both parties are leery of the soon-to-come Trans-Pacific Partnership, a 12-nation free-trade accord that would be the first trade deal that moved under the fast-track mechanism.
But the divisions within the Democratic and Republican parties make for a difficult way ahead for trade deals.
After the House rejected the trade adjustment bill last week and approved the connected TPA bill, House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, separated the bills and brought the fast-track piece of legislation to the floor Thursday as a stand-alone bill, where it passed 218 to 208.
The Senate still has to consider the bills, and Obama has said that he will not sign the fast-track bill without provisions to assist workers.
“People have very strong opinions on both sides, for and against the bill,” Veasey said. After the initial votes defeating the trade bill, the AFL-CIO bought “thank you” ads honoring Democratic members, including one for Veasey that was placed on Facebook.
Burgess, whose well-to-do district is northwest of Dallas and reaches into Tarrant County, has not felt pressure to vote in favor of the TPA. He was one of 50 Republicans to oppose the bill, compared to 190 who supported it. And he was the only Republican of the five GOP members who represent portions of Tarrant County to vote against the bill.
“I have voted for trade agreements in the past,” he said. But his constituents were firmly opposed to fast-track. “Right now, with this administration, no one is asking me to be in favor of the bill,” said Burgess.