Austin medical marijuana company sues hemp sellers over alleged sky-high THC levels
As Texas lawmakers and regulators grapple with the future of hemp-based products, an operator in the state's medical marijuana program says several companies are selling illegal drugs under the guise of legal hemp.
Austin-based Texas Original Compassionate Cultivation has filed a lawsuit seeking to block several companies from doing business in Texas and recover damages for lost revenue. The case was moved to Texas Business Court last week by one of the defendants.
Since 2017, Texas Original has had one of the rare and valuable state licenses to sell low-THC medical marijuana through the state's Compassionate Use Program. Often referred to as TCUP, it was signed into law in 2015 to help Texans with conditions like intractable epilepsy, cancer and Lou Gehrig's disease.
But the value of that license has been degraded, the company says, by "wildcat" operators in the hemp space it says are increasing THC levels beyond the legal limit and lying about it. The largely unregulated market is now competing with the highly regulated TCUP market to the detriment of its licensees, Texas Original argues.
Under House Bill 1325, passed in 2019, hemp-derived products are legal if they contain less than 0.3% delta-9 THC. The state's Compassionate Use Program formerly allowed products with up to 1% THC before switching to a 10-milligram-per-dose limit.
Lawsuit targets hemp companies
Texas Original's lawsuit alleges that 10 companies are selling marijuana products as legal hemp, marketing them deceptively and offering products that may contain contaminants. It also claims many are poaching Compassionate Use customers through false advertising while operating outside the regulatory framework imposed on medical marijuana providers.
The company says it has spent millions of dollars complying with state regulations governing the Compassionate Use Program, including security, inspections, testing and background checks.
By contrast, it argues, hemp businesses face far fewer restrictions while potentially exposing consumers to unregulated products that may contain synthetic drugs and other harmful substances.
The companies named in the lawsuit are Big Dan's Hemporium; Cloud Ponics; Greenbelt Botanicals/Greenbelt CBD; JTE Enterprises, doing business as Green Cross ATX, Green Cross CBD and Greenbox; Restart CBD; CBD American Shaman LLC; Southeast Farming Partners, doing business as Haygood Farms; Cookies Creative Consulting & Promotions; VIIA Hemp/VIIA; and Mood/Hellomood.
Restart CBD filed to move the case to Texas Business Court. Its attorney disputed the allegation that the company was illegally selling marijuana.
"This petition reads less like a legitimate effort to vindicate a legal right and more like a 39-page hissy fit from a company that appears to have confused a license to sell medical marijuana with a right to control every cannabis-related product sold in Texas," said Joseph "Jeb" Golinkin II, an attorney for Restart.
Texas Original says it commissioned independent national labs to test the defendants' products and can prove they are exceeding the legal limit for THC.
"Our position is succinct, it's based in law, and we are confident it will succeed in court," said Heidi Coughlin, an attorney for the company.
The defendants, it alleges, have managed to grow rapidly in an industry valued in the billions.
Texas Original is seeking damages for lost business, arguing that customers who should have purchased products through the Compassionate Use Program instead bought products from the defendants. It alleges the companies were unjustly enriched through illegal sales.
Testing claims at center of dispute
According to the lawsuit, the tests of the defendants' products commissioned by Texas Original show they have illegally high amounts of delta-9 THC and a variety of other problems that would make them illegal in other states.
"Over 200 independent chemical analyses proved that the vast majority of Defendants' so-called 'hemp' products are not hemp at all," the lawsuit reads.
Big Dan's Holdings LLC, doing business as Big Dan's Hemporium, sells a product called Marshmallow Dream cereal bar containing 116 milligrams of delta-9 THC - about 10 times the legal limit in Texas and above limits in some states where recreational marijuana edibles are legal, according to the lawsuit.
It goes on to argue Big Dan's is deriving its products not from hemp but from synthetic and illegal substances.
Restart sells a vape called "Green Crack," which Texas Original says was "nearly pure" delta-9 THC, according to the lawsuit. Restart denied the allegation that it was selling products that violated Texas law.
A company called Cookies sells a product called "Tahitian Lime THC Flower" that was 22 times stronger than advertised and 10 times over the state limit, according to the lawsuit.
Rize Wellness, doing business as VIIA, sells a "Blackberry Kush Vape" the lawsuit says has a 24% delta-9 THC level. Mood's "Strawberry Cough Vape" has a nearly 15% delta-9 THC level.
The lawsuit says the labs also tested for pesticides and microbial contaminants, which it says would be illegally high under the Texas Compassionate Use Program or in other states.
Hemp regulation remains unsettled
Texas has been grappling with what to do with an explosion in hemp-based companies since shortly after the 2019 Farm Bill was passed.
The Texas Department of State Health Services said it has issued more than 9,000 retail registrations to businesses across the state. The Compassionate Use Program, meanwhile, is only now expanding its number of licenses into the double digits, more than a decade after lawmakers authorized it.
And while Compassionate Use licensees are regularly tested, inspected, and face vast guardrails over their locations, who has access to their products and when - hemp-based companies have few.
The battle over regulating hemp businesses has divided some of Texas' most powerful Republican leaders and sparked court fights over testing standards for hemp products.
The Texas Legislature failed to pass regulations last year, a move that precipitated an attempt to add regulations administratively, which have now been challenged in court.
The rules that have attempted to regulate parts of the hemp market have also spared some parts of the intoxicating hemp arena.
The battle continues in court and is likely to prompt additional efforts to regulate the industry in Texas.
Copyright 2026 Tribune Content Agency. All Rights Reserved.
This story was originally published June 5, 2026 at 6:56 PM.