You pick which is the bigger (dumber?) risk: Trusting Tony Romo to remain healthy for 16 games, or having any faith in a No. 2 quarterback who was not drafted, and cut by the Detroit Lions.
Neither is a particularly good bet and that was the Cowboys’ decision before Kellen Moore suffered a broken lower right leg on the third day of practice.
In four NFL seasons, Moore appeared in a total of three games, and he was the best-case scenerio if Romo got hurt.
Jerry Jones famously said “Moore’s got it” and Cowboys offensive coordinator Scott Linehan said, Moore “has as good of instincts of anyone in the game I’ve ever been around.”
Sign Up and Save
Get six months of free digital access to the Star-Telegram
Sounds great. I don’t believe either one of them.
Despite the sound logic of wanting to develop a young quarterback of their own, the Cowboys are somehow in a worse position at the backup than they were this time last year. If/when Romo gets hurt, the Cowboys of ’16 could be worse than ’15.
In 2015, Kellen Moore played in three games with two starts. He passed for 779 yards with four touchdowns and six interceptions. Those are his career statistics since entering the league in 2012.
Even though Romo, Garrett and quarterbacks coach Wade Wilson were all former backup quarterbacks, this regime has impressively butchered the No. 2 quarterback position since Romo became the starter in ’06. Every sign says that proud tradition will continue this season.
Two days after Moore was carted off the field, the Cowboys were poring over the usual list of names you don’t want to be Dallas Cowboy.
Jerry said Thursday the team is going to be patient and not urgent.
“We don’t have to be and shouldn’t be as urgent as it might look like,” Jerry said Thursday. “We don’t know that we are void on campus with our backup quarterback at all.”
Yes. He said that.
They may like rookie fourth round pick Dak Prescott, but there is no way they will trust this offense to a guy who has never played an NFL game.
As witnessed with the Matt Cassel fiasco last season, the time to get a veteran is right now when he can acclimate himself to the offense and his team.
Current Browns QB and former Sam Houston State star Josh McCown, 37, said he has spoken with the Browns about a possible trade.
The Cowboys had a shot at former Eagles and Rams free agent quarterback Nick Foles, who instead signed with the Kansas City Chiefs.
“From the get-go, we really had a good feel that the situation there in Kansas City, he was leaning that way,” Jerry said.
That makes sense; Foles worked with and won games for the Chiefs’ coach, Andy Reid, when they were in Philadelphia.
Cowboys backup quarterbacks last season combined to throw 11 touchdowns and 15 interceptions.
Foles is a guy the Eagles dealt and the L.A. Rams no longer wanted, but he is the ideal backup: He has a 19-16 record as a starter. He’s not incompetent.
Now the Cowboys are left to look at guys like T.J. Yates, McCown and a few others no team actually wants to see on its roster.
The good news is that after Prescott took first team reps on Thursday, Garrett did say that quarterback is a “very important position” on their football team.
It’s that type of astute belief that has prevented the Cowboys from signing Johnny Manziel, but the day is not over yet. These things are fluid.
With the exception of Jon Kitna, who was the model career NFL backup, the Cowboys have not had a reliable No. 2 since either Wade Wilson or Steve Beurlein. Those guys played in the ’90s.
They didn’t develop former Aggies fourth-round pick Stephen McGee, but not for lack of effort. McGee’s problem was he couldn’t play.
Brad Johnson was finished by the time he arrived here. They had Kyle Orton, whose forte was stealing the Cowboys’ money without working.
In watching how they handled the dynamic duo of Weeden and Matt Cassel last season, whatever veteran they eventually do sign should expect to be neutered.
Potential backup Josh McCown, who is with the Browns, is 18-39 as a starting NFL quarterback. He has played for seven teams since he entered the league in 2002. He is 2-17 as a starter over the past two years.
Garrett did not trust Weeden to throw it, so they benched him. The Cowboys named Cassel, who had been acquired via trade with Buffalo on Sept. 22, the starter after he had been with the team less than one month.
“I don’t know if we would do it any different but I’d like to execute better,” Linehan said.
Well done — that puts it on the players.
It did not help that he is Matt Cassel, but that stark reality was compounded by the fact he had barely been here when he was named the starter. That’s how much Garrett and his staff did not like Weeden.
Cassel was a dramatically less-good Weeden, who was cut by the Cowboys and then went to Houston where he won enough games to put the Texans into the playoffs.
That’s not a good look.
Going with Moore behind the fragile Romo was a risk to begin with because his resume is so short. The guy behind Moore — Prescott — has no resume.
Now in Moore’s absence the Cowboys are left to shop for what will be the equivalent of Cassel or Weeden.
And nobody wants that.
Listen to Mac Engel every Tuesday and Thursday on Shan & RJ from 5:30-10 a.m. on 105.3 The Fan.