Elections

GOP candidates clash over national security

GOP candidates clash over Homeland security and immigration in Las Vegas

The fifth Republican debate of 2015 revealed friction between the candidates and highlighted their priorities around issues of protecting America against threats both at home and abroad, including ISIS, the Internet, and immigration.
Up Next
The fifth Republican debate of 2015 revealed friction between the candidates and highlighted their priorities around issues of protecting America against threats both at home and abroad, including ISIS, the Internet, and immigration.

In a presidential race reshaped by national security concerns, Sens. Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio clashed over U.S. military intervention and government spying on Americans’ communications Tuesday night, as front-runner Donald Trump defended his provocative call for banning Muslims from the United States.

Struggling former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush found his footing in trying to discredit Trump’s qualifications for the White House, chiding the brash billionaire for trying to “insult your way to the presidency.”

Fireworks had been expected between Trump and Cruz, but nothing ever really blew up between them in the first showdown since the Texas senator’s recent surge in the polls.

A somewhat kinder, gentler Trump took the opportunity to turn down the volume on his rhetoric when he was asked about his recent description of Cruz as a “maniac.” Rather than continue the hostility, Trump said of Cruz: “He’s just fine. Don’t worry about him.”

Tuesday night’s debate was the first for Republicans since the attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, Calif., which heightened fears of terrorism in the United States. The attacks have ignited a political debate about President Barack Obama’s campaign to defeat the Islamic State in the Middle East and the nation’s security posture in preventing attacks in the U.S.

Trump’s call for temporarily banning Muslims from the U.S. — a proposal roundly criticized by his rivals — dominated much of the discussion heading into the debate. He said he wasn’t seeking to discriminate against Muslims.

Read Next

“We are not talking about isolation; we’re talking about security,” he said. “We are not talking about religion; we are talking about security.”

Bush dismissed the proposal as unserious, saying “Donald is great at the one-liners, but he’s a chaos candidate and he’d be a chaos president.”

In contrast, Cruz and Rubio said they understood why Trump had raised the idea of banning Muslims and avoided directly criticizing him. Instead, they focused on each other, engaging in long debates over their differences on national security.

Rubio accused Cruz of weakening the government’s ability to track terrorists because he voted for legislation to eliminate the National Security Agency’s bulk phone-records collection program and replace it with a more restrictive effort to keep the records in phone companies’ hands.

Cruz insisted that the new law gives the government more access to cellphones and other technology that terrorists are more likely to use – a contention Rubio disputed.

“There is nothing we are allowed to do under this bill that we were not allowed to do before,” Rubio said.

Beginning after 9-11, the NSA secretly collected the daily calling records – but not contents of conversations – for most Americans, including people never suspected of any crime.

A new law, called the USA Freedom Act, passed in June with broad, bipartisan support. It ordered the NSA to end bulk collection after a six-month transition that expired last week.

Cruz on the rise

Cruz and Rubio have been sparring from afar over national security for weeks. The Texas senator is on the rise, particularly in Iowa’s kickoff caucuses, where he’s challenging Trump’s monthslong lead.

The senators – both Cuban-Americans in their 40s – also clashed over whether the U.S. should seek to remove dictators in the Middle East, including Syrian President Bashar Assad. Cruz argued that the governments that replace autocrats can often be worse than the ones opposed by the U.S., and Rubio said of Middle East dictators, “If they go, I will not shed a tear.”

The senators also displayed differences in their strategies for targeting the Islamic State. The extremist group claimed responsibility for the Nov. 13 attacks in Paris, and one of the shooters in California pledged allegiance to the group on Facebook shortly before she and her husband killed 14 people at a holiday party.

Cruz called for using “overwhelming air power” to destroy the Islamic State, whereas Rubio said airstrikes would have to be supplemented by ground troops, including American special operations forces.

Immigration views

In addition, Cruz and Rubio battled over Rubio’s support for a 2013 Senate bill that would have given illegal immigrants a path to citizenship.

Rubio said he backed the measure but “learned” that Americans don’t trust their government to secure the borders. Under questioning, he said he was still open to a path to citizenship for those here illegally, “down the road.”

And he insisted that Cruz at one time had also supported allowing those here in the country without proper documents to stay legally.

“It’s not accurate that I supported legalization; I led the fight against his amnesty bill,” Cruz said. “It’s like suggesting a fireman and an arsonist have the same record because they were both at the fire.”

President Barack Obama has largely relied on airstrikes to fight the militants in Iraq and Syria. However, he’s also sent troops to Iraq to help train and assist local forces and recently approved sending special operations forces into Syria.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie said America’s security should be the top priority in setting refugee policies, even if the Bible says to embrace those in need.

Christie was responding to a Texas Facebook user’s question about how to reconcile the Bible with his position that America should not admit any Syrian refugees.

He said he’s not backing away at all from that position and said “the end of the conversation” for him was when the FBI director told Congress that refugees can’t be vetted effectively.

The debate’s focus on national security was a detriment for retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson, who has struggled to show competence on complex international matters. He punted on questions about surveillance and American intervention in the Middle East.

Also on the main stage Tuesday night was former business executive Carly Fiorina, Ohio Gov. John Kasich and Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul. Four lower-polling candidates were to appear at an earlier event: former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, former New York Gov. George Pataki and South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham.

Staff writer John Gravois and the Star-Telegram Washington Bureau contributed to this report.

  Comments