Money Research Collective’s editorial team solely created this content. Opinions are their own, but compensation and in-depth research determine where and how companies may appear. Many featured companies advertise with us. How we make money.
New Study Finds the ‘Optimal’ Length of a Workweek (and It’s Not 40 Hours)
By Pete Grieve MONEY RESEARCH COLLECTIVE
New research finds that more than two-thirds of employees can be considered “overworked.”
Most employees don’t have much say in the length of their workweek: A full-time position stipulates a certain amount of hours, and that’s how much you have to work. Period.
But how much would people want to work if they could choose their total hours — even knowing that less work means less pay?
In a new working paper shared by the National Bureau of Economic Research, Duke University economists analyzed data from Germany and found that the “optimal” workweek is 37 hours.
The paper draws findings from the German Socio-Economic Panel, a long-running dataset that includes the following question: “If you could choose your own working hours, taking into account that your income would change according to the number of hours: How many hours would you want to work?”
The researchers found that, based on folks’ responses, more than two-thirds of sampled workers can be considered “overworked.” That means their desired hours (37.5 per week on average) exceed actual hours (42.7 per week on average).
The paper also considered a 1991-2008 dataset from the U.K. that asked workers if they’d prefer more or fewer hours, as well as similar (but even older) U.S. government surveys. In these datasets, respondents’ desired hours weren’t recorded. Still, the data suggests that people in the U.K. and Germany share a preference to work fewer hours, “while the U.S. sharply differs, featuring a much larger fraction of workers wishing to increase hours,” the Duke researchers wrote in the paper.
Is a 40-hour workweek too long?
In the U.S., the idea of the 40-hour workweek was cemented in 1940 under revisions to the Fair Labor Standards Act. It requires overtime of at least one and one-half pay for employees who work over 40 hours.
However, under U.S. laws, there are exceptions for “professional” and “administrative” employees, meaning that people earning more than $35,568 annually are not necessarily entitled to overtime pay.
Last year, the Department of Labor enacted a rule expanding overtime pay by increasing that cutoff amount to $58,656, but the policy was later vacated by a judge in Texas. The government’s lawyers filed fresh appeals this month, continuing to fight for what was originally a Biden-era change.
Despite the “norm” of the 40-hour workweek, it’s very common in the U.S. for people to work more than 40 hours per week. Prior studies have shown that Americans have worse work-life balance than workers in some European countries, working 400 hours more per year than Germans, for instance.
Some other countries have explored shorter work schedules in recent experiments.
Most notably, in April, tens of thousands of government employees in Tokyo are getting an option to work four days per week. Japan’s low fertility rate has been cited as a motivation for the experiment. Some German and Australian companies have also offered four-day workweek options.
While some groups have suggested a four-day workweek in the U.S., the idea is more of a dream than reality, at least for now. According to a new Gallup report, the average full-time worker in the U.S. reported a roughly 43-hour workweek in 2024, down only slightly from 44.1 hours in 2019.
More from Money:
Americans Work Hundreds of Hours More a Year Than Europeans: Report
Workers Are (Supposedly) Happier Than Ever With Their Jobs
Pete Grieve is a New York-based reporter who covers personal finance news. At Money, Pete covers trending stories that affect Americans’ wallets on topics including car buying, insurance, housing, credit cards, retirement and taxes. He studied political science and photography at the University of Chicago, where he was editor-in-chief of The Chicago Maroon. Pete began his career as a professional journalist in 2019. Prior to joining Money, he was a health reporter for Spectrum News in Ohio, where he wrote digital stories and appeared on TV to provide coverage to a statewide audience. He has also written for the San Francisco Chronicle, the Chicago Sun-Times and CNN Politics. Pete received extensive journalism training through Report for America, a nonprofit organization that places reporters in newsrooms to cover underreported issues and communities, and he attended the annual Investigative Reporters and Editors conference in 2021. Pete has discussed his reporting in interviews with outlets including the Columbia Journalism Review and WBEZ (Chicago's NPR station). He’s been a panelist at the Chicago Headline Club’s FOIA Fest and he received the Institute on Political Journalism’s $2,500 Award for Excellence in Collegiate Reporting in 2017. An essay he wrote for Grey City magazine was published in a 2020 book, Remembering J. Z. Smith: A Career and its Consequence.