Money Research Collective’s editorial team solely created this content. Opinions are their own, but compensation and in-depth research determine where and how companies may appear. Many featured companies advertise with us. How we make money.
AI ‘Outperforms’ Human Financial Analysts, According to New Research
By Jordan Chussler MONEY RESEARCH COLLECTIVE
In the not-so-distant future, investors might be turning to robots for market advice.
***Money is not a client of any investment adviser featured on this page. The information provided on this page is for educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Money does not offer advisory services.***
In the not-so-distant future, investors might be turning to robots for market advice. A new study has found that large language models — a type of artificial intelligence called LLMs — are better at conducting financial analysis than humans.
The findings, from researchers at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, shed light on how AI can embrace machine learning to use companies’ financial statements to predict revenue forecasts. According to the working paper, AI is able to produce a 60% rate of accuracy in predictive financial performance. Human experts’ accuracy tends to fall between 53% and 57%.
Researchers Alex Kim, Maximilian Muhn and Valeri V. Nikolaev determined that ChatGPT-4 “outperforms financial analysts in its ability to predict earnings changes [and] exhibits a relative advantage over human analysts in situations when the analysts tend to struggle.”
This is a major development given how infrequently humans — including both retail and institutional investors — are able to beat the market.
Will AI replace Wall Street analysts?
The University of Chicago study, which was published last week, comes on the back of other findings about AI’s ability to achieve alpha, a measure of outperformance gauging the difference between what an asset returned and what its benchmark returned.
Companies like Danelfin and Boosted.ai are already utilizing the technology. Both feed AI bulk financial data and have it pick stocks, with the claim of being able to outperform the S&P 500 index in the short term.
In the University of Chicago study, researchers found that “the LLM generates useful narrative insights about a company’s future performance,” which means it can have an edge over a human analyst “due to its ability to quickly analyze large quantities of unstructured data and a vast knowledge base that enables [it] to model … patterns, e.g., familiar business situations, in the data.”
The study found that AI’s score was “remarkably higher than that achieved by the [human] analysts,” suggesting the technology could soon be part of the professional analysis process.
Concerns about AI replacing jobs span most industries, leading many experts to lean towards integrating machine learning in a way that supplements (not supplants) human labor. Nonetheless, a 2020 study conducted by S&P Dow Jones Indices compared actively managed funds to the performance of the S&P 500, finding that 89% of fund managers failed to beat the benchmark index. With firms now tapping AI in hopes of beating the S&P 500 — something the majority of fund managers fail to do — it may only be a matter of time until LLMs are knocking on analysts’ doors.
Based on the results, the University of Chicago study suggests LLMs may take a central role in financial analysis decision-making. However, the authors clarify that the objective of AI in this particular case isn’t to remove real people from the equation.
“Our findings indicate the potential for LLMs to democratize financial information processing,” they wrote, adding that whether or not “AI can substantially improve human decision-making in financial markets in practice is still to be seen.”
More from Money:
Would You Let AI Manage Your Portfolio?
4 in 10 Americans Think AI Could Help Them Manage Their Money
Can AI Tools for Picking Stocks Help Investors Beat the Market?
Since joining Money in 2023 as an investment editor, Jordan has specialized in a wealth of finance topics, ranging from traditional equities (stocks, mutual funds and ETFs), income investment vehicles and alternative assets to retirement savings, debt-based fixed-income securities and commodities, with a specific focus on gold and other precious metals. He takes pride in combining his personal interests and professional experience in finance and education to help readers increase their financial literacy and make better investment choices. Jordan has worked in digital publishing for 17 years after graduating from Lynn University as a member of both the Kappa Delta Pi International Honor Society and the U.S. Achievement Academy's All-American Scholar Program. He previously served as managing editor of Weiss Ratings, where he worked alongside a team of investment writers, editors and analysts to produce educational finance content and daily, weekly and monthly market news alerts. As a contributing writer for BetterInvesting Magazine, Jordan covered topics focused on the fundamentals of investing, technical and fundamental analysis, mutual funds, debt securities, dividend investing, retirement savings strategies and passive income generation. His bylines can also be seen in Apple News, Money Crashers, The Charlotte Observer, Fort-Worth Star Telegram and a dozen other newspapers.