The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to step aside and not hear seven cases involving state bans on same-sex marriage continues to be controversial. The court’s inaction lets stand lower-court rulings that struck down the bans and was a victory for same-sex marriage in those states. But that’s not as definitive as some people on both sides of the debate want. They’d rather have a clear decision by the highest court in the land saying whether same-sex marriage bans are constitutional. Should the Supreme Court confront this challenge directly, or is it enough to let lower courts handle it?
Send no more than 150 words with your name, address and phone number to firstname.lastname@example.org. Deadline is Wednesday for publication next Monday.
Sign Up and Save
Get six months of free digital access to the Star-Telegram