VA scandal reveals weakness of big government

05/28/2014 5:38 PM

05/28/2014 5:39 PM

Proponents of big government require a no more salient example of its inherent weakness than the scandal that has recently consumed the Department of Veterans Affairs.

The burgeoning facts are like a bomb that keeps exploding.

It seems that every day a new allegation is made, a new angle revealed.

Now 42 facilities in states from Arizona to South Carolina to Texas have been implicated, as whistle-blowers in the federal agency with the second-largest budget have begun to share disturbingly similar accounts about excessive wait times for medical appointments and claims that VA officials falsified hospital records to disguise their failures.

The ink has not dried on the latest inspector general report — which unsurprisingly found these problems to be systemic — and outraged officials on both sides of the aisle have shown no hesitation in accusing the agency of conspiracy.

Yet in an era of oversight, these “gaming strategies,” according to department officials and veterans groups, are far from novel. Indeed, mutiple reviews have shown that they were just part of how one of the federal government’s largest bureaucracies has conducted its business for years.

In the wake of such incriminating revelations, critics will search for larger patterns of government failure, which are becoming easier and easier to identify.

Some commentators have been quick to draw parallels between the VA failures and those expected under the Affordable Care Act, the most controversial government expansion of healthcare in decades.

John Fund, writing in the National Review, argued that “Obamacare will dramatically expand access to the healthcare system at the same time that many surveys show doctors are likely to retire or cut back their hours. It is almost inevitable that we’ll see more waiting-list scandals as the need to ration care grows.”

Rationing is a phenomenon not unusual in nations that employ socialized healthcare programs. Fears that it might lead to scandals are far from unfounded; they may even be prescient.

But the implications of the VA scandal are much bigger than those implied by comparing the agency’s failures to those anticipated under Obamacare. They hint at a problem well beyond the scope of this president or any of his administration’s far-reaching policies.

Instead, they speak to the much greater doubt about the ability of the federal government to effectively execute its current responsibilities at a time when progressives are perpetually seeking to expand those responsibilities.

“Modern liberalism,” columnist Michael Gerson wrote, “involves centralized, bureaucratic authority and therefore presupposes administrative competence” — a virtue absent in many sectors of government.

Competence requires not only effective leadership; it demands that leaders remove those who are ineffective. But government has become increasingly less accountable as its agencies have become immune from any semblance of competition and too bloated and clumsy to effectively manage themselves.

As the The Washington Post editorialized, the “cumbersome” personnel system employed by the VA and other federal agencies “can’t recruit or compete for talent and doesn’t reward top performers or punish poor ones,” rendering it largely ineffectual and making it susceptible to error and ripe for wrongdoing.

But instead of reform and efforts to improve efficiency, the typical response is to inject more money into failing systems. According to Michael Tanner of the Cato Institute, enrollment in VA services rose 13 percent from 2007 to 2012, and its expenditures increased 76 percent over that period. Yet it still suffers from chronic budget problems.

For liberals in particular, who see government as a solution to the problems of modern society, the VA scandal exposes the fragility of such an ideology.

And it reminds us that however well-intended, the government’s ability to do good is not directly proportionate to the size of its bureaucracy.

In his 2011 State of the Union address, President Obama thrice repeated the phrase, “We do big things.”

In America, we hope that will always be true. But we do not require big government to do them.

About Cynthia Allen

Cynthia M. Allen


One of more than 200,000 people who flocked to the Lone Star State in 2013, Cynthia Allen's professional baptism by fire occurred in Washington, D.C. Her youth belies her experience and her non-native status dictates nothing about her devotion to her community.

Part of her preparation for becoming Texan entailed watching all five seasons of Friday Night Lights. A self-proclaimed conservative feminist, she is particularly interested in the impact of national issues on the city, county and state.

Email Cynthia at

Join the Discussion

Fort Worth Star-Telegram is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQ | Terms of Service