More regs, less meat
06/17/2014 6:21 PM
06/17/2014 6:23 PM
I am delighted that EPA has finally moved to abate the disastrous impact of climate change by regulating carbon-dioxide emissions from power plants.
But given the adverse reaction from the coal industry, the agency should have issued parallel regulations on emissions from meat industry operations.
Each state could than determine its own optimal strategy for curbing greenhouse gases.
A 2006 U.N. report estimated that meat production accounts for 18 percent of man-made greenhouse gases. A 2009 article in the respected World Watch magazine suggested that the contribution may be closer to 50 percent.
The meat industry generates carbon dioxide by burning forests to create animal pastures and by combustion of fossil fuels to confine, feed, transport and slaughter animals. The much more damaging methane and nitrous oxide are discharged from digestive tracts of cattle and from animal waste cesspools, respectively.
In the meantime, each of us can reduce the devastating effects of climate change every time we eat. Our local supermarkets offer a rich variety of plant-based lunch meats, hotdogs, veggie burgers and dairy-product alternatives, as well as ample selection of vegetables, fruits, grains and nuts.
— Frank Wineman, Fort Worth
Submit a Letter or Cheer/Jeer
Verification: Letters must include author's full name, address and day and home phone numbers for verification purposes only.
Frequency: Writers are limited to one letter every 30 days.
Content: Suggested letter length is 200 words or less. Please limit your Cheer or Jeer to 50 words or less.
Items may be edited. All submissions to the Star-Telegram will become the property of the Star-Telegram.
Questions: Call 817-390-7830 or contact Mike Norman, Editorial Page Director at email@example.com