Protection vs. attention
05/14/2014 5:38 PM
05/14/2014 5:39 PM
Help me out: If I hear gun rights advocates correctly, they want to carry guns to protect themselves in the event they are attacked or a shooter begins randomly firing.
That’s not totally logical, but I can see their thinking.
So tell me exactly why someone would carry a replica or carving of a gun (as several people did to Arlington council).
Maybe I missed something, but I don’t see protection applying here.
Their argument that they are just trying to get the public comfortable with guns is like walking around naked so people will get used to it.
Carrying fake guns in public places is nothing more than an attention-getting stunt. It’s just saying “hey look at me.”
It reminds me of a guy I saw walking without a shirt. He thought it was cool, but I suspect everyone he passed thought, “what a jerk.”
— David H. Towson, Fort Worth
Submit a Letter or Cheer/Jeer
Verification: Letters must include author's full name, address and day and home phone numbers for verification purposes only.
Frequency: Writers are limited to one letter every 30 days.
Content: Suggested letter length is 200 words or less. Please limit your Cheer or Jeer to 50 words or less.
Items may be edited. All submissions to the Star-Telegram will become the property of the Star-Telegram.
Questions: Call 817-390-7830 or contact Mike Norman, Editorial Page Director at email@example.com
Join the Discussion
Fort Worth Star-Telegram is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.