05/09/2014 7:03 PM
05/09/2014 7:05 PM
It is unfortunate that William Koehler’s May 6 column (see: “Parents needed, not some teachers”) drew conclusions about charter schools based on explorations of three high-performing charter systems.
While it is certainly possible the sampled schools are doing well, that doesn’t mean they are representative of all charter schools.
In fact, some studies claim that students in charter schools, some for-profit and some not, achieve at no greater level than comparable students in traditional schools.
Further, many charter schools cherry-pick their students, have excessive expulsion rates, and frown upon serving limited-English-proficiency children or students with disabilities.
Three of anything does not make a meaningful sample!
— Alan Abeson, Fort Worth
Submit a Letter or Cheer/Jeer
Verification: Letters must include author's full name, address and day and home phone numbers for verification purposes only.
Frequency: Writers are limited to one letter every 30 days.
Content: Suggested letter length is 200 words or less. Please limit your Cheer or Jeer to 50 words or less.
Items may be edited. All submissions to the Star-Telegram will become the property of the Star-Telegram.
Questions: Call 817-390-7830 or contact Mike Norman, Editorial Page Director at email@example.com
Join the Discussion
Fort Worth Star-Telegram is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.