Disincentivizing work

02/18/2014 6:30 PM

02/18/2014 6:32 PM

Why should the people in this country that work 40 or more hours per week to support themselves and their families have to help pay the healthcare costs of those who choose to work less than 40 hours a week in order to get a larger government insurance premium supplement?

Many politicians (democrats) are saying this is a great thing and wonderful opportunity for people not to have to work so hard.

What about the full-time people who will now have to work harder, possibly having to get a second job, to pay higher insurance premiums to help support those choosing to work less than full-time?

Obamacare is placing the costs of this program squarely on the shoulders of the hard working people of this country that choose to work rather than take handouts from others.

— Rowland Ballard, Granbury

Submit a Letter or Cheer/Jeer

Verification: Letters must include author's full name, address and day and home phone numbers for verification purposes only.

Frequency: Writers are limited to one letter every 30 days.

Content: Suggested letter length is 200 words or less. Please limit your Cheer or Jeer to 50 words or less.

Items may be edited. All submissions to the Star-Telegram will become the property of the Star-Telegram.

Questions: Call 817-390-7830 or contact Mike Norman, Editorial Page Director​ at mnorman@star-telegram.com​

Submit here

Join the Discussion

Fort Worth Star-Telegram is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQ | Terms of Service