Abortion is different
02/11/2014 5:43 PM
02/11/2014 5:44 PM
Katheryn Rogers’ Feb. 1 letter asks, “Why does abortion get special treatment?” when it comes to questions of taxpayer funding. She cites those who object to citizens paying for war or supporting businesses that pollute the environment. But these are not equal issues.
The killing of a human being has many names, depending on circumstances: self-defense, war casualty, homicide, suicide, abortion, euthanasia, criminal execution, accident or even environmental causes. Each raises different questions — and answers. When should tax dollars be used for such?
Is killing a necessary part of a “just” war to protect a country’s freedom? Sadly, yes. Should taxpayers pay for the killing of innocent children in the womb when there are other moral alternatives? I join many who say a definite, “No!”
Our government should promote the protection of innocent life, not its destruction.
— Carolyn Allen, Benbrook
Submit a Letter or Cheer/Jeer
Verification: Letters must include author's full name, address and day and home phone numbers for verification purposes only.
Frequency: Writers are limited to one letter every 30 days.
Content: Suggested letter length is 200 words or less. Please limit your Cheer or Jeer to 50 words or less.
Items may be edited. All submissions to the Star-Telegram will become the property of the Star-Telegram.
Questions: Call 817-390-7830 or contact Mike Norman, Editorial Page Director at email@example.com
Join the Discussion
Fort Worth Star-Telegram is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.