02/05/2014 5:43 PM
02/05/2014 5:44 PM
In Sunday’s article on the Keystone XL pipeline, inches of column space were devoted to the particulars without any reference to the big picture. (See: “As oil pipeline inches closer, opponents turn up pressure”)
The reason so many people are willing to speak out and engage in civil disobedience about this pipeline is that it is a huge step toward climate disaster, expending incredible amounts of energy and pollution just to produce the tar sands that in turn will produce more of the gases that drive climate change. The pipeline has famously been referred to as “game over” for the climate, because of the massive boost it would give to greenhouse gas emissions.
To read your article, you would think this is only a spat between advocates of energy production and “environmentalists.” The article does not bother to educate readers about why this has been such a controversy. Perhaps the Star-Telegram is running scared of annoying its right-wing readership by even discussing the issue?
— Michael Smith, Arlington
Submit a Letter or Cheer/Jeer
Verification: Letters must include author's full name, address and day and home phone numbers for verification purposes only.
Frequency: Writers are limited to one letter every 30 days.
Content: Suggested letter length is 200 words or less. Please limit your Cheer or Jeer to 50 words or less.
Items may be edited. All submissions to the Star-Telegram will become the property of the Star-Telegram.
Questions: Call 817-390-7830 or contact Mike Norman, Editorial Page Director at email@example.com
Join the Discussion
Fort Worth Star-Telegram is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.