Guest column: DFW still the dirty air capital of Texas
08/02/2014 12:00 AM
08/01/2014 6:16 PM
I don’t know who or what prompted my friend Richard Greene to write what he did about Dallas-Fort Worth air quality (“Air quality not bad, getting better,” July 27), but the language he used sure looked like the same “don’t worry, be happy” arguments that officials at the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality promote these days.
Unfortunately for Greene, his column ran just after the worst week of North Texas ozone readings in 2014 re-established the fact that region has replaced Houston as the metropolitan area with the most abysmal air quality in Texas.
A single five-day reminder of what real summer looks like was enough to produce four readings above the 1997 smog standard that DFW should have conquered years ago. In contrast, Houston hasn’t had a single reading of that severity so far this year.
Dallas-Fort Worth also once again leads Houston in the total number of readings above the current smog standard.
Whenever state officials want to remind residents how much air quality has improved, they, like Greene, start from a decade or two ago. That’s because if they started from 2008, they couldn’t draw the same conclusion.
Since then, air quality in Dallas-Fort Worth has stagnated. In fact, the 2011 TCEQ plan rhetorically aimed at achieving that old 1997 smog standard actually made ozone worse.
It didn’t include any attempts to control major industrial sources of air pollution like the Midlothian cement plants, the East Texas coal plants, or the thousands of oil and gas sources that began operation in the Barnett Shale over the last eight years.
It was the single worst failure of air quality planning in Texas history — so far.
But it may have a sequel. Gov. Rick Perry’s administration is once again drafting a lazy anti-smog plan that will not require any of those major sources to reduce pollution, instead relying on a new EPA-mandated gasoline formula to get the region “close enough” to the current standard.
According to its own predictions, however, “close enough” means the state is satisfied to leave at least four Dallas-Fort Worth monitors representing millions of residents in Tarrant County and Denton out of compliance.
It’s actually much worse than that. The smog standard the state claims it will be “close enough” to is one we already know is not protective of public health.
A survey of peer-reviewed, journal-published studies over the last decade indicates widespread health effects, including heart attacks, strokes, and respiratory disease are occurring at levels of smog currently defined as “safe.”
That’s why an independent panel of scientists recently recommended the EPA lower the national smog standard. The agency must decide to accept or reject that recommendation by December, about the same time the state will be holding public hearings on its newest do-nothing plan.
So while TCEQ is submitting a plan that won’t even achieve the current smog standard in Dallas-Fort Worth, the evidence points to a need to do much, much better.
This summer’s kind weather may yet see annual smog averages drop. But if you believe this will be the norm in coming years, then you might also believe we’re on the verge of lasting peace in the Middle East or that Justin Bieber is finally reaching maturity.
In its historic 2009 community health study, the Cook Children’s medical system found rates of childhood asthma in North Texas far exceeded state and national averages.
Texas Department of State Health Services data show Dallas-Fort Worth has one of the highest hospitalization rates for childhood asthma in the state, accounting for a third of the $172 million spent admitting kids for treatment in 2011.
We need a more serious approach to clean air than “close enough” to an already obsolete smog standard.
Jim Schermbeck is director of Downwinders at Risk, a 20-year old North Texas clean air group. www.downwindersatrisk.org
Join the Discussion
Fort Worth Star-Telegram is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.