The White House’s first-ever report on local governments that don’t cooperate with federal immigration agents shows Travis County officials declined dozens of requests to hold inmates in the days leading up to the county’s recent showdown with Gov. Greg Abbott.
Between Jan. 28 and Feb. 3, Travis County sheriff deputies declined more than 140 requests — known as detainers — from Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers to hand over undocumented immigrants for possible deportation, according to the report from the Homeland Security Department.
Travis County was far and away the Texas leader in declining ICE detainers, according to the report, which mentioned only two other Texas counties. Williamson County declined four recent detainers and Bastrop County declined three.
Last month, Abbott pulled state-grant funding for Travis County programs after Sheriff Sally Hernandez, a Democrat, said, after her 2016 election victory, that she would honor detainer requests from ICE agents on a limited basis.
Never miss a local story.
The data comes as the Texas Legislature debates Senate Bill 4, which would ban “sanctuary” jurisdictions by withholding grant funding from them and making police chiefs, sheriffs, constables and other department heads subject to a Class A misdemeanor — and potential removal from office — for violating the provision of the bill.
The bill also includes provisions that would expand the immigration enforcement powers of local police officers and would allow them to inquire about status during routine stops.
The Texas Senate voted out SB 4 in February. In the House, some have called for the bill’s scope to be reduced, arguing that most lawmakers agree that sheriffs and other law enforcement should comply with detainers from ICE.
“Today’s report from DHS is deeply disturbing and highlights the urgent need for a statewide sanctuary city ban in Texas,” Abbott said in a statement. “The Travis County Sheriff’s decision to deny ICE detainer requests and release back into our communities criminals charged with heinous crimes — including sexual offenses against children, domestic violence and kidnapping — is dangerous and should be criminal in itself.”
The information reflects that detainers were declined on immigrants charged with a variety of crimes, including driving under the influence, drug possession, sexual assault, robbery and indecent exposure to a minor. Though all of the inmates were charged, the data indicates not all of the inmates were ultimately convicted. It also shows that though the ICE detainers were issued at various times, including early and late 2016, all of the detainer requests were recorded declined on Feb. 1.
Calls to the Travis County sheriff public information office seeking clarification on the data were not immediately returned.
In a fact sheet sent by the Homeland Security Department in connection with the detainer report, ICE explains that the data is based on information it compiles after a request is declined. It also includes information from entities that comply but may not have given immigration authorities “sufficient” evidence about an inmate’s potential release.
“Lack of sufficient advance notification is based on the judgment of immigration officers, taking into consideration geographic limitations, response times, and other local logistical details,” the statement from ICE read.
The majority of the inmates listed on Monday’s report were from Mexico, although several were from Central America.
The report also shows that the amount of detainers declined by Travis County officials has skyrocketed since Hernandez took over. According to a Tribune analysis of detainer data, Travis county declined 72 requests between January 2014 and September 2015.
ICE officials will continue to compile a detainers list and release it weekly as part of a requirement in President Trump’s January 25 executive order on immigration, a Homeland Security Department spokesperson said in a news release.
The Texas Tribune is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.