A stiff winter wind smacks into the plate-glass windows of Jon Salis’ Lake Palo Pinto home as six space heaters work overtime to keep it warm.
Natural gas used to make his 2,100-square-foot house cozy. In fact, Atmos Energy’s gas service was one reason Salis decided to remodel a lakeshore cabin about 80 miles west of Arlington and move here in 2001.
Last summer, Salis learned that the natural gas flowing through his pipes isn’t the fully processed, clean-burning fuel that most Texans picture. Rather, it’s what he calls a “raw gas cocktail,” tapped from a pipeline that runs beneath the lake on its way to a processing plant.
Never miss a local story.
The more Salis learned about the gas coming into his home, the more scared he became. Finally, he just turned off his furnace.
“I don’t want to be on this gas,” he said. “I want to be off it as quick as I can.”
Salis’ neighborhood was hooked up to a natural gas pipeline decades ago through a “farm tap.” In years past, many utilities and landowners considered it easiest and cheapest to hook up rural homes to nearby pipelines that carry mostly raw fuel from gas fields to processing plants.
Known as “wet gas” because it contains higher concentrations of liquids such as ethane and butane, the unprocessed gas is prone to freezing in cold weather and, in rare cases, can corrode appliances, causing them to misfire and potentially emit carbon monoxide, according to documents filed with the Texas Railroad Commission.
No one knows how many Texas customers are hooked up to wet gas. The Railroad Commission regulates natural gas utilities and the state’s 426,000-mile network of natural gas, hazardous-liquid and other pipelines, but it doesn’t set standards for the gas pumped through them.
Atmos, which serves more than 1.5 million customers in its Mid-Tex division, said fewer than 200 rely on wet gas. The gas is ill-suited to power homes, Atmos employees testified at a Railroad Commission hearing in September. But the company does not consider it dangerous, and none of its customers have reported related health problems, Atmos told The Texas Tribune and the Star-Telegram in response to questions.
“Safety is our number one priority,” Jennifer Altieri, an Atmos spokeswoman, said in an email. “Like with any utility service, there is a risk things can go wrong. But there are thousands of people who live in Texas that are fully aware of the risks of wet gas and yet still choose to utilize it as an energy source for their homes.”
But Salis and his attorney, Michelle McFaddin, think Atmos and other utilities should be more upfront about the risks of using wet gas — even if some experts describe them as small.
“No one is looking at this,” said McFaddin, a former assistant director of enforcement at the Railroad Commission. “The problem in my mind is serving it to customers who don’t know what they’re getting.”
Jim Bradbury, an environmental lawyer in Fort Worth who has handled pipeline abandonment cases, said he was surprised to hear about the situation at Lake Palo Pinto, although he knows that some gas leases have unregulated farm taps.
“I think there should be a standard and a requirement of transportation. If a home is being provided untreated gas, they should certainly know about it, at a minimum,” Bradbury said.
The Railroad Commission focuses its health and safety efforts mostly on the condition of the pipelines rather than on the gas pumped through them. Texas law does not spell out standards for the quality of gas delivered to homes.
Most residential gas is purged of troublesome liquids in processing. But over the decades, thousands of landowners negotiated to tap into raw gas when they allowed pipeline companies to build across their property.
“The people, when they got it, were aware of the conditions,” said Bill Fowler, an attorney in Odessa who has represented pipeline companies. “A long time ago, they would strap a meter on anybody’s house.”
Now, Atmos and other utilities are seeking permission to turn off farm taps and convert neighborhoods to other fuels. In 2009, utilities filed seven applications to abandon wet gas service, according to the Railroad Commission. Last year, the agency received at least 23. In most cases, the companies call the services too expensive to maintain.
But the companies occasionally face push-back from landowners. Some argue that shutting off service would violate contracts. Others simply don’t want to switch to other fuels. And at least one landowner told Atmos in another case that he wasn’t convinced that unprocessed gas was dangerous.
“Atmos Energy cannot simply cease utility service to these customers,” Altieri said. “It first must obtain approval from the Railroad Commission, a process that can be long and drawn out especially when the company is met with opposition.”
The opposition included Salis — at first.
Salis, who grew up in Arlington and moved to Lake Palo Pinto from Pantego, was alone among nine homeowners in his subdivision to object when Atmos asked regulators for permission to shut off service. Atmos doesn’t own the pipeline, which has changed hands over the years, but it owns the taps, the meters and the right to use it. The service connections “were made at a time when wet gas service was viewed more favorably,” Atmos said.
Salis’ eight neighbors readily accepted Atmos’ offer last year to replace any gas-powered appliances with electric or propane items, which is cheaper than hooking up the subdivision to another natural gas pipeline. Salis rejected the deal, saying he wanted the company to consider hooking up to alternative fuels. But he changed his tune after learning more about unprocessed gas in the Railroad Commission hearing that followed.
Jesse Garcia, an operations supervisor for Atmos, testified that the gas was “not suitable for residential use” and described its potential for freezing. During cross-examination, he said the gas had been “nonquality” ever since customers first requested service and can cause a “very irregular flame burning in your appliances” that could give off carbon monoxide.
Garcia also testified that Atmos had not systematically told customers of those risks but that technicians may have done so during individual service calls. The subdivision made 129 such calls in a year’s time, according to hearing documents, and that high number was likely due to the poor quality of the gas.
“It took everything I had to keep from blowing up,” Salis said, recalling the hearing. “I was sitting there boiling in the chair listening to these guys.”
McFaddin said she was “dumbfounded” by the testimony, which echoes analyses by other experts. A 2005 Natural Gas Council white paper, for instance, says using wet gas in homes can cause “soot formation, elevated levels of carbon monoxide and pollutant emissions,” as well as “nuisance shutdowns from extinguished pilots or tripping of safety switches.”
Michelle Foss, chief energy economist for the Center for Energy Economics at the University of Texas at Austin, said that such hazards are uncommon and that many appliances can handle the energy-richer wet gas.
Fowler said the overall safety record of unprocessed gas service is “exceptionally good.” He has also never heard of carbon monoxide being a problem with the farm taps.
Salis wants the Railroad Commission to make Atmos notify all remaining wet gas customers of the fuel’s risk, a demand the company has resisted. “Atmos Energy believes a general communication regarding the risks of wet natural gas would create more questions and confusion,” it said in an October brief.
The Railroad Commission will decide whether Atmos can abandon the service in the coming months. Salis said that day can’t come soon enough. When all is said and done, he wonders how many others may be in the same predicament and not know it.
“I turn on my water and it turns brown, so I know there’s a problem. But with gas being invisible and odorless, your assumption is if it lights my furnace and water heater, it is OK,” Salis said. “I see a big hole in the system.”
This article was jointly reported by The Texas Tribune and the Star-Telegram.