After a barrage of lawsuits directed at the online shopping industry, it appeared Amazon Inc. was starting to phase out list pricing, a controversial practice accused of deceptively inflating how much consumers save through the e-commerce giant.
But a study commissioned by Consumer Watchdog finds that the pricing system remains rampant, affecting more than a quarter of the 4,000 products examined by the advocacy group on Amazon.com.
List prices are a familiar sight to most online shoppers: crossed-out price tags displayed with the current, cheaper cost. The larger the difference between the two, the more likely consumers will be drawn to buying the item.
The problem is that few know how Amazon determines the list price, which could be arbitrarily inflated to create what appears to be a steeper discount. The company, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment, says on its website that “List Price” means the suggested retail price of a product as provided by a manufacturer, supplier or seller.”
Critics, however, say this is misleading and doesn’t reflect a reasonable estimate of how much products really cost on the open market. In its study, Consumer Watchdog said it found at least half the list prices examined were greater than the prevailing market price.
“There’s no real transparency about what the heck they’re doing,” said John M. Simpson, privacy project director for Consumer Watchdog, which filed a petition Monday calling on California Attorney General Xavier Becerra to investigate Amazon. “At a minimum, there needs to be some clear understanding about how they’re coming up with these purported list prices.”
The practice has garnered widespread attention in recent years after a number of lawsuits.
In 2014, Amazon rival Overstock was fined $6.8 million by a California judge for misstating its sale prices. That same year, a still-pending class action suit was launched in California against Amazon over its prices.
More recently, Amazon was fined about $750,000 in January by Canada’s Competition Bureau for misleading savings claims. Amazon also agreed to change its pricing practice in Canada.
Brick and mortar stores have also been accused of misleading pricing practices. In December, the Los Angeles City Attorney’s office sued J.C. Penney, Sears, Kohl’s and Macy’s for falsely advertising lofty discounts.
“Unfortunately, this sales tactic or fictitious pricing actually works and retailers know that,” said Bonnie Patten, executive director of Truth in Advertising, a consumer advocacy group unaffiliated with the Consumer Watchdog study. “It’s not just Amazon.”
All retailers are required under federal law to display reference prices that reflect how much an item is generally sold for. This can be determined a number of ways, including looking at the average prices for any particular item, the median price or even the most commonly used price in order to build a comparison.
Not knowing precisely how Amazon comes up with its numbers, Consumer Watchdog compared the 4,000 products in its study to competitors’ prices to determine if they reflect the average, median or most common prices on the market. What it found was that none of these measures was likely a determining factor.
It couldn’t have been average because 71 percent of the products picked for the study had more expensive list prices than competitors’ sale prices. It couldn’t have been median either after the group found 74 percent of the items were listed at a greater cost than the median prices offered by competitors. Lastly, it was unlikely Amazon used the most common prices since more than half the products in the study were listed at a higher cost compared with competitors.
Amazon’s list prices “were an entirely bogus notional price that created the false impression that customers were getting a deal when they were not,” Simpson wrote in his petition to the state attorney general.