Marcia Clark talks about her second career as a novelist
09/06/2013 1:10 PM
09/12/2013 11:26 AM
For Marcia Clark, it all started with Nancy Drew mysteries.
“I don’t mean for this to sound frivolous, but I think it really might be that simple,” the famous Los Angeles prosecutor-turned-mystery novelist says. “I became a criminal lawyer, and then a writer, because of a lifelong fascination with crime and crime fiction.
“And that goes all the way back to being an avid fan of Nancy Drew when I was 5.”
Clark, who will be in Tarrant County next week for two events benefiting the Keller Public Library, became a household name nearly two decades ago as the lead prosecutor in the 1995 O.J. Simpson trial. But five years ago, she embarked on a different career.
Now Clark uses her insider’s knowledge, acquired through more than a decade with the L.A. District Attorney’s Office and Special Trials Unit, in her work writing legal thrillers.
“Being a prosecutor was wonderful,” she says. “I loved it. I was happy to go to work every day. I felt I was doing something important. But I have to say, I’m really, really not missing it, because I love what I do now even more. By becoming a novelist, I’ve realized a childhood dream.”
Clark’s three novels over the past three years chronicle the adventures of Special Trials Unit prosecutor Rachel Knight. The latest, Killer Ambition, was published in June by Mulholland Books, an imprint of Little, Brown. She’s currently working on book No. 4.
She’ll be in North Texas on Thursday for “An Evening With Marcia Clark,” a ticketed event that consists of dinner, remarks and a book signing. It’ll be at 6 p.m. at Sky Creek Ranch Golf Club in Keller.
She also has a free speaking engagement and signing scheduled at 3 p.m. Wednesday at the Keller Public Library.
We chatted with Clark last week about her new life as a novelist.
What compelled you to take the leap of faith and embark on a full-time writing career?
It was something I always wanted to do. Although, I have to say, there was a lot of trial and error involved when I first sat down to write novels about five years ago. It took awhile before I felt I had gotten the characters right and the tone right.
Now I’m really glad no one can see those first couple of books. They found a resting place in the fireplace, and that’s just where they belong.
A lot of authors tell stories about shadowing real-life cops, lawyers and forensics types in the name of research. After your years of living in that world, how much of that kind of research, if any, do you need to do?
I do have it easier, because I can draw on my experience. That means I don’t have to prevail upon real cops and prosecutors for every little bit of information. Although I did consult with a computer expert regarding the hacking parts of the case in Killer Ambition, and with a crime lab expert regarding DNA. They were wonderful and generous with their time. But I wonder sometimes if they make themselves that available for everyone trying to do research. I imagine it’s not always the case.
What do you most hope that readers take away from your books? Is it mostly about giving them a few days of an entertaining story? Or are you aiming for something more?
I certainly want people to be entertained. But I also want them to be somewhat informed about the way investigations really work — and about the way that cops and DAs work together: the camaraderie, the banter and the genuine sense of purpose, which is the heart and soul of law enforcement.
These people really care. They’re doing those jobs because they really care about others, they really care about taking care of victims, and they really care about justice. It’s not just a job. It’s a mission.
When you do events like the one next week for the Keller library, do people still ask a lot of questions about the Simpson case? And if so, do you welcome those discussions, even though practically everything about the case has been asked and answered?
It’s interesting. Questions about that case are fewer and fewer. To the point that, in my last two speaking engagements, there was not one question about it. I think it’s because, as you put it, all the questions have been asked, all the answers have been given. There’s only so much you can say about it.
Plus, other events have taken precedence since then. Other cases are in the news. So what I see more of is people asking me, “What do you think of Casey Anthony? What do you think of Jodi Arias? What do you think of George Zimmerman?”
I suspect we’re more likely to get into some kind of discussion about those cases. Although mostly people just want me to weigh in in a kind of one-sentence, lightning-round way as opposed to having an extended discussion about it.
Is it true that there might be a TV version of Rachel Knight in the making?
That’s what we’re waiting to hear. TNT optioned the books for a one-hour drama series. We turned in the pilot script and we’re hoping to hear sometime soon if they want to shoot a pilot.
How much of you is in the Rachel Knight character and how much of Rachel is in you?
Well, Rachel is my middle name. Read into that what you will. For me, doing that made it easier to channel the prosecutor when I sat down to write. Not that I wanted to channel myself necessarily, but I think there’s no way to avoid having myself in the character.
Inevitably something in my own experience, something that I’ve been through or seen or known, informs all of the characters I write — and that means the bad guys as well as the good guys. I’m all over the place in these books.
Including the bad guys. Readers might want to re-examine the villains in your books to find evidence of your dark side.
Uh-oh. I think I may have said too much!
Join the Discussion
Fort Worth Star-Telegram is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.