WASHINGTON -- Toyota hurriedly ordered recalls of nearly 10,000 Lexus SUVs for possible rollover dangers Monday and agreed to a record $16.4 million fine for a slow response in its broader earlier recall, scrambling to fix safety worries that threaten the Japanese auto giant's reputation.
The fine, the maximum under law, could hurt Toyota Motor Corp.'s image more than its financial bottom line: The penalty is the equivalent of a little more than $2 for every vehicle the company sold around the globe in 2009. And analysts said it will have little impact on dozens of private lawsuits, which have been combined before a federal judge in Santa Ana, Calif.
"In the court of public opinion, paying the fine speaks volumes. But at the end of the day, the fines are simply background noise in terms of the civil litigation," said Richard Arsenault, a plaintiff's attorney in Alexandria, La. "What's really important are the facts that were the catalyst for the fines."
Addressing new safety concerns, Toyota said it will recall all 9,400 of the 2010 Lexus GX 460s that went on sale in late December -- 5,600 that have been sold and 3,800 still at dealers or elsewhere in the distribution pipeline. The announcement came less than a week after Consumer Reports issued a warning about the SUVs, a sharp contrast to the government's contention that Toyota took four months to order its huge recall of other models over sticking gas pedals.
For the Lexus recall, Toyota said dealers will update software in the stability control system, which is supposed to help prevent rollovers. Toyota had already halted sales of new GX 460s and begun tests on all of the company's other SUVs.
The government accused the company of hiding the earlier defects involving gas pedals, a contention that Toyota rejected though it agreed to pay the fine.
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said Toyota "put consumers at risk" by failing to promptly notify authorities about potentially defective accelerator pedals on 2.3 million vehicles. LaHood said Toyota knew about the problem in late September but didn't issue the recall until late January, violating a federal law that requires an automaker to notify the government of a safety defect within five business days.
"They did not disclose within five days that there was a problem. They didn't disclose it for several months, so we fined them the maximum amounts, and they decided to pay it and that means they knew they did something wrong," LaHood told reporters in St. Louis. "They did try to hide it -- that's what we accused them of -- and they've agreed to that."
Toyota said it agreed to the fine to avoid a lengthy legal battle but denied the government's allegation that it broke the law. In a statement, Toyota acknowledged "that we could have done a better job of sharing relevant information within our global operations and outside the company, but we did not try to hide a defect to avoid dealing with a safety problem."
The fine does not free Toyota from potential civil and criminal penalties. The automaker still faces dozens of lawsuits in federal courts, while federal prosecutors and the Securities and Exchange Commission conduct investigations related to the recalls.
In monetary terms, the penalty is largely symbolic, given Toyota's strong balance sheet. The company had cash assets of $23.6 billion as of Dec. 31 and has said it expects to post a net profit of $885 million for the fiscal year that ended March 31.
The previous record fine was $1 million paid by General Motors in 2004 for responding too slowly on a recall of nearly 600,000 vehicles over windshield wiper failure.
The Toyota fine was based on timelines provided by the automaker that showed that it had known about the defect at least since Sept. 29, when it issued repair procedures to distributors in 31 European countries to address complaints of sticking pedals, sudden increases in engine RPM and unexpected vehicle acceleration.
The documents also indicated that Toyota knew that owners in the U.S. had experienced the same problems.
The penalty is the largest the government could assess under a 2000 law enacted after a massive recall of Bridgestone/Firestone Inc. tires.