Licenses required

Posted Wednesday, Jul. 30, 2014  comments  Print Reprints

Have more to add? News tip? Tell us

I am a pediatric radiologic technologist (RT) registered with the American Registry of RTs and a licensed Texas medical RT.

The Texas Sunset Commission is seeking to end licensing programs for RTs (Medical Radiation Technology Act), nuclear medicine technologists, radiation therapists and medical physicists. They believe radiology equipment and staff are monitored by other governmental agencies.

This is true for hospital departments, but rarely for private offices.

I saw private offices (before the MRT Act) with X-ray equipment assigning secretaries, receptionists, and non-radiology employees to radiate patients. Most images were of poor quality and repeated in hospitals by radiology professionals.

Non-radiology employees are not monitored by the government. This means no one checks for poor images, overexposure, weak cancer treatment protocols, employee film badges and working equipment.

When the MRT Act passed, private offices hired radiology professionals. Image quality improved, equipment was inspected, and ALARA (“as low as [is] reasonably achievable”) standards were followed.

Texas citizens need to contact the Sunset Commission. Ask them to preserve the MRT Act and licensure of medical physicists. Texans want licensed RTs performing their medical images, inspections of radiation equipment and the best in cancer treatments by radiation therapists.

— Lois Lehman, Dallas

Looking for comments?

We welcome your comments on this story, but please be civil. Do not use profanity, hate speech, threats, personal abuse or any device to draw undue attention. Our policy requires those wishing to post here to use their real identity.

Our commenting policy | Facebook commenting FAQ | Why Facebook?