The American economy’s U-turn

Posted Tuesday, Mar. 11, 2014  comments  Print Reprints
A

Have more to add? News tip? Tell us

Do you recall a time in America when the income of a single schoolteacher or baker or salesman or mechanic was enough to buy a home, have two cars and raise a family?

That used to be the norm. For three decades after World War II, America created the largest middle class the world had ever seen.

During those years the earnings of the typical American worker doubled, just as the size of the American economy doubled. (Over the last 30 years, by contrast, the size of the economy doubled again, but the earnings of the typical American went nowhere.)

In that earlier period, more than a third of all workers belonged to a trade union, giving average workers the bargaining power to get a large and growing share of the large and growing economic pie. (Now, fewer than 7 percent of private-sector workers are unionized.)

Then, CEO pay averaged about 20 times the pay of their typical worker. (Now it’s more than 200 times.)

In those years, the richest 1 percent took home 9 percent to 10 percent of total income. (Today. the top 1 percent gets more than 20 percent.)

Then, the tax rate on highest-income Americans never fell below 70 percent; under Dwight Eisenhower, a Republican, it was 91 percent. (Today, the top tax rate is 39.6 percent.)

In those decades, tax revenues from the wealthy and the middle class were used to build the largest infrastructure project in our history, the interstate highway system.

And to build the world’s largest and best system of free public education, and dramatically expand public higher education. (Now our infrastructure has been collapsing from deferred maintenance, our public schools have deteriorated, and higher education has become unaffordable to many.)

We didn’t stop there. We enacted the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act to extend prosperity and participation to African-Americans; Medicare and Medicaid to provide health care to the poor and reduce poverty among America’s seniors; and the Environmental Protection Act to help save our planet.

And we made sure banking was boring.

As the economy grew, we all prospered. And that broad-based prosperity enabled us to invest in our future, creating more and better jobs and a higher standard of living.

Then came the great U-turn, and for the last 30 years we’ve been heading in the opposite direction.

Why?

Some blame globalization and the loss of America’s manufacturing core. Others point to new technologies that replaced routine jobs with automated machinery, software and robotics.

But if these were the culprits, they only raise a deeper question: Why didn’t we share the gains from globalization and technological advances more broadly?

Why didn’t we invest them in superb schools, higher skills, a world-class infrastructure?

Others blame Ronald Reagan’s worship of the so-called “free market,” supply-side economics and deregulation. But why did we cling to these ideas for so long? Why are so many people still clinging to them?

Some others believe Americans became greedier. But if that’s the explanation, why did our national character change so dramatically?

Perhaps the real problem is we forgot what we once achieved together.

Robert Reich is Chancellor’s Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley.

Looking for comments?

We welcome your comments on this story, but please be civil. Do not use profanity, hate speech, threats, personal abuse, images, internet links or any device to draw undue attention. Our policy requires those wishing to post here to use their real identity.

Our commenting policy | Facebook commenting FAQ | Why Facebook?