State’s role

Posted Tuesday, Jan. 21, 2014  comments  Print Reprints
A

Have more to add? News tip? Tell us

The state of Texas has assumed the role of “head of the household’ for the Munoz family. The question for me is, will they also assume financial responsibility for their decision. (See: “JPS sued over life-support law,” Jan. 15) Does anyone believe an insurance company would approve a claim for life-sustaining treatment of a dead person?

If this baby is delivered and requires long-term special medical care, does the state assume this financial cost or does the state get to make this family’s decisions and Mr. Munoz gets to pay for them?

This is a decision none of us would want to face. But if it must be faced, it should be decided by the people that have to live daily with the results of the decision.

— Nancy Reynolds,

Comanche

Looking for comments?

We welcome your comments on this story, but please be civil. Do not use profanity, hate speech, threats, personal abuse, images, internet links or any device to draw undue attention. Our policy requires those wishing to post here to use their real identity.

Our commenting policy | Facebook commenting FAQ | Why Facebook?