Big bang theory

Posted Thursday, Jan. 16, 2014  comments  Print Reprints

Have more to add? News tip? Tell us

In the Star-Telegram’s Jan. 8 edition, we were told: “The Hubble Space Telescope has peered back to a chaotic time 13.2 billion years ago.” Also: “Because light travels nearly 6 trillion miles a year, as telescopes look farther from Earth, they see earlier into the past.” (See: “Images offer a glimpse of the ‘cosmic dawn,’ Jan. 8)

The clear implication from this is that the Hubble has now seen objects 13.2 billion light-years away, so we are seeing space as it existed virtually just moments after the big bang (“cosmic dawn”). Yet there are already “galaxies” in existence.

Are we supposed to believe that the universe went from nothing but hydrogen atoms spewing away to formation of whole galaxies in some mere 0.1 billion years? Don’t the telescope’s pictures rather suggest that the whole star formation from big bang hypothesis is suspect?

And what if the Hubble’s images just keep on coming from farther and farther away? What will big bang theorists say then?

— Thomas F. Harkins Jr., Fort Worth

Looking for comments?

We welcome your comments on this story, but please be civil. Do not use profanity, hate speech, threats, personal abuse or any device to draw undue attention. Our policy requires those wishing to post here to use their real identity.

Our commenting policy | Facebook commenting FAQ | Why Facebook?