JPS lawyer’s role

Posted Tuesday, Jan. 14, 2014  comments  Print Reprints

Have more to add? News tip? Tell us

I think it is wrong that Marlise Muñoz is being kept on life support when her family says doctors have declared her brain-dead.

Regardless of her pregnancy, which was in an early state, her wishes to not be kept “alive” should have been respected. I wish she would have put that in writing; her legal case might have been stronger.

In addition, I think it is rather interesting that one of John Peter Smith’s hired outside lawyers, Neal Adams, is an active member of the pro-life movement.

Surely there are lawyers in Tarrant County with no open affiliation to either pro-life or pro-choice organizations and enough expertise in common litigation issues involving hospitals.

I wonder if such a lawyer might interpret Texas’ law differently and grant Marlise’s wish. I would hope so.

— Lorraine Levine, Arlington

Looking for comments?

We welcome your comments on this story, but please be civil. Do not use profanity, hate speech, threats, personal abuse or any device to draw undue attention. Our policy requires those wishing to post here to use their real identity.

Our commenting policy | Facebook commenting FAQ | Why Facebook?