High-stakes testing

Posted Wednesday, Apr. 24, 2013  comments  Print Reprints
A

Have more to add? News tip? Tell us

In her column April 16, Pat Hardy makes some assertions hardly anyone could disagree with -- kids need to be exposed to social studies for a myriad of good reasons. (See: "Reducing social studies will stunt Texas students' growth as citizens")

But her argument is based on one assumption: Unless we tie social studies instruction to high-stakes testing, kids won't learn.

In other words, de-emphasize testing and you de-emphasize learning.

Just maybe it's the other way around. Perhaps if we de-emphasize teaching to the test, teachers will be free to explore -- and students to learn -- about history and geography and government.

And maybe social studies would become an island of real learning in a sea of test preparation drills.

Perhaps social studies could become a kind of pilot project in schools to demonstrate what happens when we focus on learning and on children and not on test scores.

High-stakes testing, as well as the teaching methodologies that go with it -- not classrooms that emphasize critical thinking and engage students in genuine learning -- is what dumbs down the curriculum.

-- Tommy Thomason, Arlington

Looking for comments?

We welcome your comments on this story, but please be civil. Do not use profanity, hate speech, threats, personal abuse or any device to draw undue attention. Our policy requires those wishing to post here to use their real identity.

Our commenting policy | Facebook commenting FAQ | Why Facebook?