Prejudicial remarks?

Posted Monday, Mar. 11, 2013 0 comments  Print Reprints
A

Have more to add? News tip? Tell us

Bob Ray Sanders accused Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia of delivering "a blatant prejudicial rant" in response to oral arguments in a case before the high court on whether part of the 1965 Voting Rights Act should be struck down. (See: "Justice Scalia's statements show his politics and his prejudice," Wednesday)

I worked with Justice Scalia some years ago, before he joined the Supreme Court, when he was on a National Security Council committee of which I was the executive director.

The committee met monthly in the Roosevelt Room of the White House. I had many opportunities to exchange views with Scalia. I can attest that, based on my experience, Scalia was a man of integrity and never showed an indication of harboring prejudicial views.

Having a strong legal position on how to interpret the Constitution does not translate into being racially prejudiced. Indeed, I find it interesting that, when unable to make an otherwise substantive argument, those on the left frequently use the race card when trying to denigrate an argument or person on any issue that involves race.

-- William Brown, Arlington

Looking for comments?

We welcome your comments on this story, but please be civil. Do not use profanity, hate speech, threats, personal abuse, images, internet links or any device to draw undue attention. Comments deemed inappropriate will be removed and repeated abusers will be banned. NOTE: If you log in using your Twitter account, your comments will be signed using the name on your Twitter profile, NOT your Twitter user name. Read our full comment policy.