Republicans must embrace immigration reform

Posted Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2013  comments  Print Reprints
A

Have more to add? News tip? Tell us

sanders The wake-up call Republicans received last Election Day has the party and some of its more popular and strident leaders engaged in an "extreme makeover."

It was as if that alarm clock Nov. 6 rang with a Spanish accent and spoke so loudly that the GOP was forced to rethink its position on one of its major wedge issues -- the one many local and national politicians had used effectively to unite the most extreme segments of the party base: immigration.

For some, like Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham, it's been an about-face from harsh rhetoric of the past and an embracing of a comprehensive immigration policy that may lead to a path toward citizenship for millions of undocumented workers. For others, such as Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer and other state executives who followed her lead in cracking down on illegal immigrants, it has been more a silencing of the lions. They're not roaring much about the issue.

A lawyer friend of mine, who lives in Tarrant County but is actively involved in Dallas County politics, insists that members of the Grand Old Party have changed their name to make it easier for their candidates to identify with Hispanics when soliciting those much-coveted but elusive votes.

They have become the "Republicanos," he says: It rhymes with "Chicano" and "Mexicano."

Most of them have seen the light, realizing that if they are to have a fighting chance in future elections they must attract more Latino voters, 71 percent of whom casts ballots for President Barack Obama in 2012. Although Republicanos are advocating a "kinder, gentler" party, Hispanics are looking for action instead of words and symbols.

The GOP has been promoting two of its fast-rising, high-profile Latino members of the Senate, Marco Rubio from Florida and newly elected Texan Ted Cruz, a Tea Party darling who opposes the DREAM Act and a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants but has advised Republicanos to soften their rhetoric on the subject.

Rubio is part of the bipartisan "gang of eight" (four Democrats and four Republicans) in the Senate who have pledged to draft comprehensive immigration legislation, a move the president has welcomed. Rubio has been a more reasonable voice on immigration and will have an important role as the issue goes forward.

The president, after upsetting Republicans by leaking portions of a proposed immigration plan that he would put forth if Congress didn't act, has tried to make amends by calling and meeting with some GOP leaders.

Republicanos, while working through this -- and I believe they will -- must understand that just putting forth Hispanic faces will not solve their "Latino problem," especially when those faces are Cuban, a group that has not suffered the same under our immigration policy as people from Mexico and Central America. And they haven't endured the same discrimination as "Hispanic" American citizens from Puerto Rico.

The major difference in an administration plan and one supported by Republicans is the "path to citizenship." Republicans are ready to talk about guest worker programs and legal "residency," but not citizenship. That is because no matter how many barriers are set up to full citizenship -- back of the line, years' long waiting period, etc. -- if the now-illegal immigrants ever become citizens, it will mean they gain that most precious American right: the right to vote.

The true Republicanos can't stand that thought, and they believe that's the president's ultimate motive in proposing comprehensive immigration reform.

They should stop resisting it and embrace it, knowing that the demographics continue to signal a fast-growing Hispanic population.

The Republicanos surely realize that pushing the snooze button on that alarm clock will not stop time -- or the inevitable change that is on the way.

Bob Ray Sanders' column appears Sundays and

Wednesdays.

817-390-7775

Twitter: @BobRaySanders

Looking for comments?

We welcome your comments on this story, but please be civil. Do not use profanity, hate speech, threats, personal abuse, images, internet links or any device to draw undue attention. Our policy requires those wishing to post here to use their real identity.

Our commenting policy | Facebook commenting FAQ | Why Facebook?