Republicans should provide good jobs that Obama hasn't

Posted Thursday, Feb. 21, 2013  comments  Print Reprints

Have more to add? News tip? Tell us

Finally. After weeks advocating for illegal immigrants, placing our daughters in combat, obsessing with gun control and devising new gay rights, President Obama devoted the early moments of his State of the Union address to the concerns of 80 percent of American citizens: job creation and economic growth.

The problem, as it was in his first term, is that these pressing needs got lost in a laundry list of liberal policy distractions. Not that Obama has been entirely numb to the crisis of the 12 million unemployed; the 11 million stuck in part-time gigs or not looking for work; and millions of others who have left the workforce altogether. In fact, he has highlighted the imperative of creating well-paying jobs in all four of his State of the Union addresses.

But the president has yet to deliver for middle-income folks, especially the 70 percent of the adult population without college degrees. Nor will his repackaged promises change anything.

The Congressional Budget Office foresees continued slow growth, with an average unemployment rate of 7.9 percent this year and 7.8 percent for 2014. Moreover, of the few jobs created under Obama, most are retail or service-sector positions that are inadequate to support a family. Despite all the good talk, why does Obama continue to shortchange Middle America?

As last week's speech confirmed, Obama remains animated mostly by concerns that gladden his base: more tax increases, more Solyndra-type green-energy boondoggles, "easier" voting procedures and making Head Start-like programs universal under the euphemism of "early learning." That is not to say that the president's proposals to advance manufacturing, infrastructure, science, technology and a higher minimum wage are without merit. If pursued with the same pro-growth, pro-industry vigor that built the country between the Great Depression and the 1970s, they could jumpstart a real recovery.

That's why Republicans should one-up his job-creation ideas while pruning away his counterproductive social agenda. As the Republicans once promised a chicken in every pot, today they should promise a high-paying "family-wage" job with medical insurance and retirement benefits for every family.

Such a pledge would require "powering up" U.S. industry, a goal Obama says he supports while simultaneously seeking to "power down" energy use and layer new regulations and restrictions on the private sector. The GOP should point out this contradiction while fighting for more energy, more manufacturing and more jobs than Obama could ever imagine.

Here's how: End the outsourcing of whole production supply chains to China by increasing the domestic-content requirement of all Pentagon procurement contracts to 100 percent. This would ensure a secure and fully made-in-the-USA military. Meanwhile, build Obama's smart-infrastructure initiative, but favor new highway and bridge construction, using U.S. materials and workers, while dropping high-speed rail -- the environmentalists' new bridge to nowhere.

To power this renaissance, the GOP could call for an Apollo moon shot: a new generation of safe nuclear power plants providing free electricity to all factories and start-ups in the heartland. The party should demand that Obama's Environmental Protection Agency get out of the way of the production of a century's worth of cheap and cleaner natural gas. And insist on the construction of the Keystone pipeline, another job driver that Obama has opposed.

By rallying all pro-growth forces behind a literal rebuilding of the nation, Republicans could deliver what Obama has failed to provide: good jobs at good wages for all.

Robert W. Patterson served as a welfare adviser in administration of Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett, a Republican.

Looking for comments?

We welcome your comments on this story, but please be civil. Do not use profanity, hate speech, threats, personal abuse or any device to draw undue attention. Our policy requires those wishing to post here to use their real identity.

Our commenting policy | Facebook commenting FAQ | Why Facebook?